Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Is this the worst news report ever written?
#1
Factual inaccuracy, bad grammar, spelling mistakes, it's got 'em all.
Well, it is the Daily Mail, I suppose: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2315871/.
posted by Duncan B Campbell
https://ninth-legion.blogspot.com/
Reply
#2
Well I know something new; the Romans tried to hold a point further than the Antonine wall. Cool.
Reply
#3
Nice pictures of Hadrian's Wall though.

One assumes they were pushed for time or their spell checker wasn't working. AS for grammar, is it still taught by anyone other than Latin and Greek tutors???
Moi Watson

Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, Merlot in one hand, Cigar in the other; body thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and screaming "WOO HOO, what a ride!
Reply
#4
Sadly not ...

The moral is , avoid the Daily Mail!
[Image: wip2_r1_c1-1-1.jpg] [Image: Comitatuslogo3.jpg]


aka Paul B, moderator
http://www.romanarmy.net/auxilia.htm
Moderation in all things
Reply
#5
Apart from all else it is interesting how this frontier shuts off the highlands very much like the other frontier lower down that actually crosses Hadrian's Wall, known as the 255 line of the late Raymond Selkirk that closed off the Eden valley at nearly the same type of angle across the country.
Brian Stobbs
Reply
#6
Quote:Factual inaccuracy, bad grammar, spelling mistakes, it's got 'em all.
Well, it is the Daily Mail, I suppose: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2315871/.
So, the Grauniad has a rival!
Michael King Macdona

And do as adversaries do in law, -
Strive mightily, but eat and drink as friends.
(The Taming of the Shrew: Act 1, Scene 2)
Reply
#7
The Daily Mail isn't a newspaper. It's a gossip rag aimed at the semi-literate.
Author: Bronze Age Military Equipment, Pen & Sword Books
Reply
#8
Quote:Apart from all else it is interesting how this frontier shuts off the highlands very much like the other frontier lower down that actually crosses Hadrian's Wall, known as the 255 line of the late Raymond Selkirk that closed off the Eden valley at nearly the same type of angle across the country.

Every lecturer I ever had reckoned that the primary purpose of Hadrian's Wall and other similar limes was not defence - it was to control access so that the Romans could collect taxes and duties. Defence was a consideration but not the main one.
Author: Bronze Age Military Equipment, Pen & Sword Books
Reply
#9
Is there anything new in that report? Didn't we already know that there was a chain of forts north of the Antonine Wall? Or this another case of the archaeologists juicing things up to get more research money?
Tom Mallory
NY, USA
Wannabe winner of the corona
graminea and the Indy 500.
Reply
#10
Quote:... late fist century AD defence system...
It couldn't have lasted long, though. The Western empire dissolved during the kicking-and-headbutting century.
Dan D'Silva

Far beyond the rising sun
I ride the winds of fate
Prepared to go where my heart belongs,
Back to the past again.

--  Gamma Ray

Well, I'm tough, rough, ready and I'm able
To pick myself up from under this table...

--  Thin Lizzy

Join the Horde! - http://xerxesmillion.blogspot.com/
Reply
#11
Dan.

I don't dispute that Hadrian's Wall may well have been to control local traffic through the Tyne Valley area but it was also of a defensive nature ie many regiments of soldiers stationed on it.
Then the other frontiers delt with here in this post were indeed of a defensive nature hence the reason why Hadrian had to come along later to build his stone wall and put a tremendous garrison on it instead of just having forts along a road system, and I don't think it takes a degree in archaeology for anyone to be able to determine that.
Brian Stobbs
Reply
#12
The Daily Mail/Fail/Heil article just seems to be treating the Gask Ridge defensive line as being something new and revolutionary in archaeology, whereas in reality the presence of glen-blocking forts in Scotland has been known about for sometime. The last annual report from TRGP was from 2010 apparently, and I think the Mail article was taken pretty much directly from that? Overall I think the only major problem is directly comparing land and access denial to a monumental structure.

Woolliscroft and Hoffmann are pretty well known Wall scholars, so I doubt the fault for serious factual errors lies with them.

(Edit: Yay, I can post again!)
Reply
#13
I think that the statement in the link about the Gask Ridge frontier is a bit bold where it suggests that this frontier is the first land frontier anywhere, for it has been thought that Agricola may well have created the Stanegate that goes coast to coast across the country.
Brian Stobbs
Reply
#14
Oh, to be so sheltered from the American media that one could think this the worst news report ever. It must be nice to trill one's R's in the Highlands, safe and secure from the vile putrescence, an ocean away, that dares call itself journalism. How I envy you. Smile
Jason

Nil igitur mors est ad nos neque pertinet hilum,
quandoquidem natura animi mortalis habetur.
Reply
#15
Quote:It must be nice to trill one's R's in the Highlands, ...
Shhhhh -- what we do with our Rs in the Highlands stays in the Highlands. :whistle:
posted by Duncan B Campbell
https://ninth-legion.blogspot.com/
Reply


Forum Jump: