01-22-2014, 08:10 AM
Funny subject line apart (well, matter of opinion I guess ) I was thinking about something the other day. There is an old saying that I have heard (true or not, it is probably not meant to be read literally) that the ordinary roman soldier probably had more metal than a common german tribesman would see in a lifetime. In any case, a roman in a full suit of armour was a precious little thing walking by.
I have read some passages, most notably from the punic wars, of enemies stealing roman armour. But thinking of how valuable it should have been, wouldn't it be a rather common sight to face off against say "germans" in a lorica or roman chain mail?
If we take the battle of Idistaviso as an example, we could probably assume that at least some portions of the germanic warriors were equiped with roman armour from Varus not so fortunate brothers in arms, if not very large parts. Do we have any archeological sources of roman armour found in graves where they shouldn't have been? What is your opinion, was it common practices to loot and re-use the armour or would the armours have been broken down into other things?
What are your thoughts on the subject?
I have read some passages, most notably from the punic wars, of enemies stealing roman armour. But thinking of how valuable it should have been, wouldn't it be a rather common sight to face off against say "germans" in a lorica or roman chain mail?
If we take the battle of Idistaviso as an example, we could probably assume that at least some portions of the germanic warriors were equiped with roman armour from Varus not so fortunate brothers in arms, if not very large parts. Do we have any archeological sources of roman armour found in graves where they shouldn't have been? What is your opinion, was it common practices to loot and re-use the armour or would the armours have been broken down into other things?
What are your thoughts on the subject?