09-21-2012, 05:51 PM
Quote:Hmm. Am I right in thinking that the only 'new' legions mentioned in the ND for which we have an independent corroboration dated pre-Constantine would be I Iovia and II Herculia?Possibly. It's not clear cut. (Never is, is it?!) These legions are recorded in the Antonine Itinerary, which dates from the later third century and is perhaps Diocletianic -- iirc it mentions a Diocletianopolis, which would seem to clinch matters! -- but no other "Diocletianic" legions are mentioned, which makes it a bit of a puzzle.
The tombstone of Valerius Thiumpus (prefect of II Herculia: ILS 2781) might be Diocletianic and the legions' names certainly suggest Diocletian. Ritterling was happy to go with legion names (especially I Maximiana and III Diocletiana) as indicators of Diocletianic origin. But as far as I am aware, there's no independent corroboration.