Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Was the Lorica REALLY polished?
#14
Ow Ow Ow!<br>
<br>
My brain is hurting with all of this mish-mangle talk in English, Latin and Japanese! Make it stop! OWW!<br>
<br>
I really like Matt's idea that Armor was made to be carried around, nice and heavy like, and to be polished ad nauseam to look damned spiffy in. I'm not quite sold either way on how Roman armor was finished. I am a big fan of Pistolier/Cuirassier armor in the 16th+ centuries, and I know Black and White armor can have some damned nice looking effects. At Higgins there is a Pistolier armor from the English Civil War, which is darkly blued with a hint of silver edging, and I think it looks Sweet. I'm sure a blued Lor.Seg must look really stunning.<br>
<br>
As for Romans, I'm leaning towards the polished shiny deal, as well as a Satin finish, both to me look awfully impressive.<br>
<br>
Anything to take time off from polishing and to put it back into training and marching I think may have been on the back of a Roman officer's mind, so tinning and other such tricks I'm sure was accepted and welcomed. But we don't have solid evidence for that yet...So anyways I'm sticking with polished and maybe Satin finished. Awww yeah<br>
<br>
-ANDY <p></p><i></i>
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Was the Lorica REALLY polished? - by Anonymous - 08-13-2003, 10:15 AM
Polishing - by Anonymous - 08-13-2003, 11:13 AM
Polished bits - by Anonymous - 08-13-2003, 11:18 AM
Re: Polished bits - by Anonymous - 08-13-2003, 11:50 AM
Re: Polished bits - by Anonymous - 08-13-2003, 02:03 PM
Re: Polished bits - by Anonymous - 08-13-2003, 03:29 PM
Re: Polished bits - by Hibernicus - 08-13-2003, 04:00 PM
Bright metal, for sure - by Matthew Amt - 08-13-2003, 04:26 PM
Re: Bright metal, for sure - by Anonymous - 08-13-2003, 11:03 PM
Re: Bright metal, for sure - by Anonymous - 08-14-2003, 12:05 AM
Re: Bright metal, for sure - by Anonymous - 08-14-2003, 01:14 AM
Re: Bright metal, for sure - by Anonymous - 08-14-2003, 02:31 AM
Re: Polished bits - by DECIMvS MERCATIvS VARIANvS - 08-14-2003, 08:50 AM
Free labor! - by Matthew Amt - 08-14-2003, 01:48 PM
Re: Free labor! - by Anonymous - 08-14-2003, 02:50 PM
Re: Free labor! - by derek forrest - 08-14-2003, 05:22 PM
Re: Free labor! - by Anonymous - 08-14-2003, 07:51 PM
Re: Free labor! - by Anonymous - 08-14-2003, 11:02 PM
Re: Free labor! - by Anonymous - 08-14-2003, 11:30 PM
Re: Free labor! - by scythius - 08-15-2003, 12:45 AM
Re: Free labor! - by DECIMvS MERCATIvS VARIANvS - 08-15-2003, 09:11 AM
Re: low furnace - by Anonymous - 08-15-2003, 01:44 PM
iron steel shiny bits - by Hibernicus - 08-15-2003, 03:32 PM
Re: Was the Lorica REALLY polished? - by Anonymous - 08-16-2003, 03:48 AM
Re: Was the Lorica REALLY polished? - by Anonymous - 08-16-2003, 07:28 PM
Re: What about neatsfoot oil, or pig fat? - by Anonymous - 08-16-2003, 07:38 PM
Re: What about neatsfoot oil, or pig fat? - by Anonymous - 08-16-2003, 09:16 PM
Re: What about neatsfoot oil, or pig fat? - by Anonymous - 08-17-2003, 10:23 AM
Fragility - by Hibernicus - 08-17-2003, 04:34 PM
Re: Was the Lorica REALLY polished? - by Guest - 08-20-2003, 05:12 PM
Re: Was the Lorica REALLY polished? - by Anonymous - 08-20-2003, 10:27 PM
Re: Was the Lorica REALLY polished? - by Anonymous - 08-21-2003, 12:00 PM
was the lorica polished - by Anonymous - 08-26-2003, 08:04 PM
Re: was the lorica polished - by Hibernicus - 08-27-2003, 12:20 AM
Re: was the lorica polished - by Anonymous - 08-27-2003, 02:56 PM
Re: was the lorica polished - by FlaviusCrispus - 08-27-2003, 03:32 PM
was lorica polished - by Anonymous - 08-28-2003, 05:26 PM
Was the Lorica polished? - by Anonymous - 09-08-2003, 12:55 PM
Re: Was the Lorica polished? - by FlaviusCrispus - 09-08-2003, 06:14 PM
Re: Was the Lorica polished? - by FlaviusCrispus - 09-09-2003, 04:06 PM
Re: Was the Lorica polished? - by Hibernicus - 09-09-2003, 05:27 PM
nice shiney loricae - by Anonymous - 09-09-2003, 07:43 PM
Re: Was the Lorica polished? - by Guest - 09-10-2003, 09:07 AM
... - by Matthew Amt - 09-10-2003, 01:43 PM
Re: ... - by Anonymous - 09-10-2003, 05:37 PM
Perhaps... - by Hibernicus - 09-11-2003, 02:10 PM
Colour vs Colour - by Anonymous - 09-11-2003, 02:46 PM
Re: Colour vs Colour - by Anonymous - 09-12-2003, 02:05 PM
Never give up... - by Matthew Amt - 09-13-2003, 09:56 PM
Scholars vs. Reenactors? - by Anonymous - 09-15-2003, 03:56 PM
Re: Scholars vs. Reenactors? or Scholars AND Reenactors - by Anonymous - 09-15-2003, 08:32 PM
Re: Never give up... - by FlaviusCrispus - 09-15-2003, 09:21 PM
Boy-o-boy...lol - by Anonymous - 09-17-2003, 04:35 PM
K.I.S.S. - by Matthew Amt - 09-18-2003, 03:17 PM
Hold the phone! - by Matthew Amt - 09-18-2003, 03:26 PM
Burnishing - by John Maddox Roberts - 09-22-2003, 01:25 PM
PS - by Anonymous - 09-22-2003, 11:07 PM
The Deepeeka Shine - by Daniel S Peterson - 09-23-2003, 07:14 PM
Re: The Deepeeka Shine - by richard - 09-25-2003, 12:28 AM
Re: Free labor! - by Anonymous - 10-29-2003, 05:16 AM
begs the question... - by richard - 11-18-2003, 04:08 AM
What\'s the ancient equivalent of the scotch bright pad? - by Anonymous - 11-18-2003, 01:52 PM
Re: tinning mail??? - by Anonymous - 11-23-2003, 02:49 PM
On Polishing - by Anonymous - 12-04-2003, 01:28 PM
Re: On Polishing - by Aluscladiusmaximus - 12-14-2003, 05:38 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Dulling Polished Metal Decimus Aurelius Varus 18 4,602 05-16-2008, 09:01 PM
Last Post: Paullus Scipio

Forum Jump: