01-25-2012, 09:29 PM
Quote:At first they justified dating it into the Vespasianic Era, but later finds there in a larger contex strongly advocated dating it "late".Thanks again! That would imply there's no discernable difference between a 4th c camp and one of 200 years before. Interesting that it's pottery once again providing the date estimate.
(e.G. "Mayener Ware" pottery which Dr. B. Heukemes linked to the 4th century)
Quote:we'd be careful, I think, considering the use of "abandoned" fortresses from the High Empire as marching/temporary camps in "late" times for earnestVery true - successive Roman armies would probably have used the same or similar routes into enemy territory, marched similar distances and therefore constructed camps in similar locations: we see this layering of fortifications where successive camps are of different sizes, but possibly if the old trench lines were just redug on the same plan - or, as you say, surviving fortifications reused - perhaps it wouldn't be so easy to make out the difference in date.
Nathan Ross