Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Standard frontage allotted to a single legionary?
#9
Hi Sean,
Quote: Robert, are you sure? Round and oblong shields are rarely wider than 90 cm, so normally if you have significant overlap between shields you are closer than 2 cubits per file.
Indeed, when they are overlapping you are in synaspismos, very close order. I don't think that Vegetius had that in mind: close order sure, but not as packed as it would get with overlapping shields.
Quote:(Incidentally, that translation of Vegetius has a misprint; he says that one thousand six hundred and sixty six men fit into a mile. One Roman mile is 5,000 Roman feet, and 3 x 1666 = 4998).
Well spotted! My Milner indeed has 1666. I was in a hurry and did not do the math. Wink
Quote: I'm not sure if I agree that shields, in general, are designed to overlap; do you mean late Roman shields?
Indeed, Late Roman shields, which I think were designed to overlap.
Quote:Of course these numbers are approximate- soldiers probably measured the right space by eye and by using their arms as two-cubit measure- but they work as rules of thumb.
Vegetius as well as Maurice are of course writing a treatise (although Maurice had experience in the field, which shows), but you are correct - a lot would have been different in practice.
Robert Vermaat
MODERATOR
FECTIO Late Romans
THE CAUSE OF WAR MUST BE JUST
(Maurikios-Strategikon, book VIII.2: Maxim 12)
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Standard frontage allotted to a single legionary? - by Robert Vermaat - 11-21-2011, 11:06 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  frontage of a consular army Michael Collins 25 2,635 09-18-2021, 05:12 PM
Last Post: Hanny
  Wild Boar - Legionary Standard Nerva 8 2,736 10-17-2007, 12:49 PM
Last Post: Gaius Julius Caesar

Forum Jump: