Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Roman Emperors and the \"King\" title
#7
Quote:If no one else can think of any other instances of “Rex” being used, he must really have been unique.

The seniority of the Roman civil structure under Constantine and his immediate successors ranked something like this:

  1. Augustus/Sebastos
  2. Caesar
  3. Patrician (honorary)
  4. Praetorian Prefect
  5. Vicarius
  6. Consul


Zosimus actually says Constantine reintroduced and elevated the title of Patrician, though honorary, above that of Praetorian Prefect.

Since Hannibalianus' inheritence was so minimal it seems that a new rank had to be created for him. In his case "Rex" must have ranked between a Praetorian Prefect and a Vicarius. Just my guess. I doubt any of Constantine's designated successors were meant to be equal. It would have been unorthodox since there was always a senior emperor. Then again, his succession plans were also unorthodox! What a mess.

Normally, of course, Rex was used to refer to client or foreign kings.

~Theo
Jaime
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Roman Emperors and the \"King\" title - by Theodosius the Great - 11-11-2011, 01:19 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Complexion of the roman emperors Virilis 28 12,058 05-31-2021, 02:43 PM
Last Post: Till_When?
  Portraits of Roman Emperors Renatus 4 1,358 08-18-2020, 02:43 PM
Last Post: Athena Areias
  Charlemagne and later \"Roman\" emperors Epictetus 22 7,484 12-26-2011, 11:05 PM
Last Post: Kai

Forum Jump: