11-02-2011, 01:04 PM
My understanding of textiles is limited to what I need for work so my intervention in this thread is somewhat rash, but I understood this was an issue of yarn and fleece rather than weave.
I believed there was little doubt that twill was used in Scandinavia before the Roman occupation, but it generally used S-spun yarn of the Huldremose type.
In Scandinavia the introduction of the loom weight and the replacement of the tubular loom with the warp-weighted loom lead to the use of Z twill, as used elsewhere in Europe. It was a little late in coming to Sweden, but the use of Z-spun yarns is seen by some as a “Roman” influence. Native fleece was turned into cloth of varying quality using Z-spun yarn from around AD 200.
The Virring type textile is specifically a fine good quality wool, appearing in Denmark in the late 1st century AD , becoming common all over Scandinavia by the 3rd and 4th centuries but disappearing completely around AD 400. It is the product of a warp-weighted loom, but also very good quality well developed fleece of a type not native to Scandinavia at that time. Hence a belief that it was imported. It does have parallels in Britain and the rest of Europe.
I use
http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Zljld...es&f=false
to guide me through all this.
I believed there was little doubt that twill was used in Scandinavia before the Roman occupation, but it generally used S-spun yarn of the Huldremose type.
In Scandinavia the introduction of the loom weight and the replacement of the tubular loom with the warp-weighted loom lead to the use of Z twill, as used elsewhere in Europe. It was a little late in coming to Sweden, but the use of Z-spun yarns is seen by some as a “Roman” influence. Native fleece was turned into cloth of varying quality using Z-spun yarn from around AD 200.
The Virring type textile is specifically a fine good quality wool, appearing in Denmark in the late 1st century AD , becoming common all over Scandinavia by the 3rd and 4th centuries but disappearing completely around AD 400. It is the product of a warp-weighted loom, but also very good quality well developed fleece of a type not native to Scandinavia at that time. Hence a belief that it was imported. It does have parallels in Britain and the rest of Europe.
I use
http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Zljld...es&f=false
to guide me through all this.
John Conyard
York
A member of Comitatus Late Roman
Reconstruction Group
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.comitatus.net">http://www.comitatus.net
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.historicalinterpretations.net">http://www.historicalinterpretations.net
<a class="postlink" href="http://lateantiquearchaeology.wordpress.com">http://lateantiquearchaeology.wordpress.com
York
A member of Comitatus Late Roman
Reconstruction Group
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.comitatus.net">http://www.comitatus.net
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.historicalinterpretations.net">http://www.historicalinterpretations.net
<a class="postlink" href="http://lateantiquearchaeology.wordpress.com">http://lateantiquearchaeology.wordpress.com