Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
New Late Roman buckle from Dorchester on Thames
#16
Quote:Well, it does seem as if it was a Saxon wearing it.
these days, archaeologists seem far less inclined to 'define' the ethnicity of a burial just by the grave goods. After all, it's been attested often enough that members of one group can don the artifacts of another: Gauls did not become Italians when they adopted Roman goods and artifacts, nor did Syrians or Africans. Although we could say that a person is 'likely to have' belonged to one or another group, it's futile to speculate on any solid interpretation. the owner of the LR buckle could have been a Saxon, true, but he could have been a Briton as well, as could the person next to him have been, even if the latter was buried with 'typical' AS grave goods. Don't forget that this was a period of transition, in with the cultural borders were very fluid.
Robert Vermaat
MODERATOR
FECTIO Late Romans
THE CAUSE OF WAR MUST BE JUST
(Maurikios-Strategikon, book VIII.2: Maxim 12)
Reply
#17
What an incredible find. If it was in britan dating between 400-500 like they say, then it almost certaintly was from Anglo-Saxon, Frisian, or Romano-British Mercenaries if we keep the Roman withdrawl Date at 410. Otherwise it could possibly belong to a Miles in the Field Army or Limitanei Garrisons.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Roman Buckle John Melfordicus 10 2,542 02-20-2015, 08:14 PM
Last Post: John Melfordicus
  Late Roman chip carved buckle question Caballo 20 6,202 05-25-2014, 02:07 PM
Last Post: Thomas V.
  Late Roman buckle parallels - French help needed Caballo 6 2,185 01-30-2014, 06:56 AM
Last Post: Agraes

Forum Jump: