Posts: 655
Threads: 67
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
0
While it is currently accepted that the auxiliary were paid less than legionary troops as a general rule, do we know if a Citizen member of a auxiliary unit was paid the same rate or perhaps higher due to their higher social status?
There is some documentation of Citizen Cohorts receiving special donatives, so I got to thinking on this while doing my Cross Fit work out today.
Thanks!
Mike Daniels
a.k.a
Titus Minicius Parthicus
Legio VI FFC.
If not me...who?
If not now...when?
:wink: <img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_wink.gif" alt=":wink:" title="Wink" />:wink:
Posts: 2,913
Threads: 21
Joined: Jan 2008
Reputation:
1
As an Auxiliary soldier did not gain citizenship until he had become time served after his 25 years, his pay would have been less than that of a Legionary.
However Citizen Cohorts may well refer to retired soldiers who could be called upon to respond to problems in the areas of the provinces where they had retired to.
Brian Stobbs
Posts: 3,079
Threads: 50
Joined: Nov 2003
Reputation:
20
"his pay would have been less than that of a Legionary."
Actually, the evidence might tend to suggest otherwise.
I would refer you to two articles in JRS 82 (1992) and 84 (1994) respectively.
The first article 'Roman Army Pay Scales,' by M.A. Speidel, looks at all the evidence available for military pay and proposes that auxiliary pay was five sixths of legionary pay.
The second article 'Roman Military Pay from Caesar to Diocletian,' by R. Alston, was written in reply to Speidel's article and looks again at all of the available evidence but challenges some of Speidel's assumptions and proposes that auxiliary pay may well have been the same as legionary pay.
Both are very closely argued articles but are essential reading if you are interested in Roman military pay. I am not aware of any new evidence having emerged since these articles were written.
As far as correlations between citizenship and wealth are concerned, we should be mindful of the the character of Tremalcio in Petronius' 'Satiricon'. Tremalcio, as a freedman, is not a citizen but commands great wealth. Obviously, the Satiricon is a satire but it should still cause us to tread carefully in assuming that any correlation between citizenship and wealth existed in the lower levels of society.
Crispvs
Who is called \'\'Paul\'\' by no-one other than his wife, parents and brothers. :!: <img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_exclaim.gif" alt=":!:" title="Exclamation" />:!:
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.romanarmy.net">www.romanarmy.net
Posts: 3,079
Threads: 50
Joined: Nov 2003
Reputation:
20
Thanks Duncan,
I noticed that apparent contradiction myself when I read it but had since forgotten. Thanks for reminding me.
Mind you, that said, I was never quite sure where Speidel managed to find a 1% deduction in each record, considering the nature of some of the evidence.
Crispvs
Who is called \'\'Paul\'\' by no-one other than his wife, parents and brothers. :!: <img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_exclaim.gif" alt=":!:" title="Exclamation" />:!:
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.romanarmy.net">www.romanarmy.net