Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Emperor: the gates of Rome
#43
Conn,

As a simple kind of guy, I'll say this- I really have enjoyed reading your books.

I appreciate the historical notes at the back of each book.

With so Little surviving evidence on Roman history as compared to say WWII, I find some of the critics to be annoying, especially when you look at a time span of two thousand years. A lot of detailed information can be lost, distorted, etc..

Case in point-as guys involved in a fire fire ten minutes after it happened and five years later re telling it again, and you might be scratching your head if they are talking about the same event.

Oh to the critics-I am a living example of that Smile

I think you have done a marvelous job telling a great story that is interesting to read, and I am sure a lot more folks are looking at the marvelous history of Rome.

best of luck to you
ATW_ABN

v/r
Mike
Mike Daniels
a.k.a

Titus Minicius Parthicus

Legio VI FFC.


If not me...who?

If not now...when?
:wink: <img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_wink.gif" alt=":wink:" title="Wink" />:wink:
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Emperor: the gates of Rome - by Anonymous - 01-24-2003, 06:38 AM
Re: Emperor: the gates of Rome - by Caius Fabius - 01-25-2003, 02:13 AM
Stay away from it. - by Anonymous - 01-29-2003, 06:59 AM
Caesar book - by John Maddox Roberts - 01-29-2003, 03:12 PM
The Gates of Rome - by Anonymous - 03-17-2003, 10:34 PM
Re: The Gates of Rome - by John Maddox Roberts - 03-18-2003, 12:16 AM
Re: The Gates of Rome - by Jasper Oorthuys - 03-18-2003, 06:11 AM
it\'s not personal!!! - by Anonymous - 03-18-2003, 07:56 AM
conns\'s book - by Anonymous - 03-18-2003, 11:50 AM
Re: conns\'s book - by richard - 03-18-2003, 01:10 PM
bah humbug - by Goffredo - 03-18-2003, 03:45 PM
In good company, here. - by Anonymous - 03-18-2003, 11:30 PM
Re: In good company, here. - by richard - 03-19-2003, 04:27 AM
Support!! - by Anonymous - 04-06-2003, 01:26 PM
Re: Support!! - by richard - 04-06-2003, 06:28 PM
Support and the Web - by Anonymous - 04-08-2003, 07:11 AM
Re: Support and the Web - by richard - 04-22-2003, 12:46 AM
Burning the crow - by Anonymous - 04-22-2003, 09:34 PM
Re: Burning the crow - by Anonymous - 06-03-2003, 11:18 AM
Reply - by Anonymous - 06-09-2003, 10:59 AM
Re: Reply - by Anonymous - 06-09-2003, 12:41 PM
Objective criticism? - by Caius Fabius - 06-18-2003, 01:48 PM
Baseball and historical fiction - by Anonymous - 06-19-2003, 07:31 PM
historical fiction - by richard - 06-19-2003, 08:05 PM
Re: historical fiction - by Anonymous - 06-20-2003, 03:49 AM
Re: historical fiction - by rekirts - 06-20-2003, 04:03 AM
Re: historical fiction - by Anonymous - 06-20-2003, 08:03 AM
Pink Flamingos - by Nathan Ross - 06-25-2003, 08:56 AM
Re: Pink Flamingos - by Caius Fabius - 06-25-2003, 02:50 PM
Reply to Gregalis - by Anonymous - 06-26-2003, 12:00 AM
Re: Reply to Gregalis - by richard - 06-26-2003, 08:47 AM
Re: Reply to Gregalis - by Jasper Oorthuys - 06-26-2003, 09:01 AM
Flamingos in print - by Nathan Ross - 06-26-2003, 11:16 AM
Agents - by Anonymous - 06-26-2003, 12:27 PM
Re: Patrick O\'Brian - by rekirts - 06-26-2003, 10:27 PM
Age and O\'Brian - by Anonymous - 06-26-2003, 11:28 PM
writing stuff - by John Maddox Roberts - 06-27-2003, 01:00 AM
Re: writing stuff - by Frank Miranda - 06-27-2003, 01:21 AM
editorial direction - by John Maddox Roberts - 06-27-2003, 01:25 PM
Shorts and turnups - by Anonymous - 06-28-2003, 12:45 AM
Re: editorial direction - by rekirts - 06-28-2003, 02:10 PM
Re: Emperor: the gates of Rome - by mt - 12-07-2005, 11:39 AM
Re: Emperor: the gates of Rome - by arklore70 - 12-21-2005, 08:26 PM
Editorial direction - by Ben Kane - 04-24-2010, 08:34 PM

Forum Jump: