Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
How well armoured was the Roman army?
#40
Why would segmetata not be effective agiainst arrows? I have never seen this postulated before. I have been trying to visualize an arrow striking an iron plate. I have a difficult time seeing how an arrow can penetrate such a plate unless it is fired from an extremely short distance, much as a bullet will penetrate modern ballistic armor if the gun is fired at close enough range. It is interesting to consider why the Romans gave up protection against arrows. Perhaps they thought that is what the shield is for?
Tom Mallory
NY, USA
Wannabe winner of the corona
graminea and the Indy 500.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: How well armoured was the Roman army? - by Q Rutilius - 09-13-2010, 02:56 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Armoured Ships in Antiquity Eleatic Guest 9 2,733 11-29-2008, 07:38 PM
Last Post: Sean Manning
  Roman armoured statue found in Kythnos Caballo 0 1,276 10-03-2008, 06:17 AM
Last Post: Caballo

Forum Jump: