Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why didn\'t the Romans conquer Scotland?
#15
I like the point about the eastern trade routes through Parthia, & why Rome made so many attempts to bring them into the empire. I suppose Scotland didn't have much that was desirable to Rome. Even Britain could contribute something to the Roman state. Do we know of any metal deposits in Scotland during that period? Still, why would Rome would be so willing (at least under Domitian it seems) to attempt to hold onto Scotland, & then so willing to give it up under Nerva? Was it just Domitian trying to live up to his father & brother?
Aurelius Falco (Tony Butara)
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Why didn\'t the Romans conquer Scotland? - by AureliusFalco - 05-05-2010, 02:33 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Romans in North Lanarkshire, scotland fhaggis 2 2,545 01-07-2016, 08:30 AM
Last Post: mcbishop
  Why didn\'t Romans fought in single line? utku 44 9,022 08-31-2015, 10:23 AM
Last Post: Densus

Forum Jump: