11-26-2017, 08:58 AM
(This post was last modified: 11-26-2017, 10:28 AM by David Scothorn.)
(11-25-2017, 11:36 PM)MonsGraupius Wrote:(11-25-2017, 08:11 PM)Nathan Ross Wrote:(11-25-2017, 07:42 AM)MonsGraupius Wrote: I visited what I think is a better candidate... (which is not to say it is a good candidate, only that the rest are rubbish).
Dear Mons Graupius,
I particularly admired your analysis in your search for the MG site, which lead me to read 'Romans In Moray' (by Ian McKeiller, Moray New Horizons 2005 ISBN 0-9551137-0-9).
My point is that, for MG, you had a preferred site, or at least narrowed the preferences down, without having the benefit of a high degree of 'evidence', so why can you not do the same for this battle?
From your previous work, I am sure you are not one of those who fails to disclose their assessment, then, when it is found, if we are not all dead, declares ''That's what I always thought''. So I agree with John, come on, please out it (or them!).
''Hugh amount of time'' might refer to the number of posts on this forum and other pieces of research, rather than groundwork.