11-06-2014, 08:00 AM
it doesn't stand up to the evidence we have of Paulinus's cautious generalship
hear say, more over prioritisation of text and its interpretation. It's a maybe but the dash or field reports can't be ruled out because we think we have a certainty about individuals characters or the accuracy of ancient authors.
roistering ?
is this a typo for re-grouping?
We have the judgement of resident cavalry expert Moi
OK point taken, Moi rules, doesn't make it Dunstable though.
Hmm, I think somebody else here on RMM also has a theory
But your version is the most fully articulated.
hear say, more over prioritisation of text and its interpretation. It's a maybe but the dash or field reports can't be ruled out because we think we have a certainty about individuals characters or the accuracy of ancient authors.
roistering ?
is this a typo for re-grouping?
We have the judgement of resident cavalry expert Moi
OK point taken, Moi rules, doesn't make it Dunstable though.
Hmm, I think somebody else here on RMM also has a theory
But your version is the most fully articulated.