Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Painted cuirasses
#1
Hi all!

I have seen in frescos images of painted helmets, and linothorax usually have painted designs. Is there any evidence of painted muscled cuirasses? Does somebody know if there is any fresco showing some kind of painted design on a muscled cuirass?

Thank you very much
Javier Sanchez

"A tomb now suffices him for whom the whole world was not sufficient"
[Image: 76946975ce3.png]
Reply
#2
Example of painted cuirasses exist in the British Museum on pottery.
A pottery fragment showing Ariston of the Phylaeidae with a purple painted metalic cuirass. (see Greek art section for original and interpretation)
Also potery showing linothoraxes painted in "checker-board" or romboid designs.
Also "Gods in color" project of the German Antiquites collection proved that armors were painted in bright colours or had painted geometric decoration. (linothorax/leather threads have images)

Kind regards
Reply
#3
I've not seen any direct examples of Classical or Hellenistic representations of muscled cuirasses which have been painted (though I've not seen the vase Stefanos refers to, but it sounds very interesting), but the muscled cuirass of the Augustus Prima Porta was painted in various colours. Combine that with the evidence that shows that both helmets and shields were painted in the Hellenistic period, and I absolutely do not doubt that such cuirasses were painted (and probably brightly, too!).
Ruben

He had with him the selfsame rifle you see with him now, all mounted in german silver and the name that he\'d give it set with silver wire under the checkpiece in latin: Et In Arcadia Ego. Common enough for a man to name his gun. His is the first and only ever I seen with an inscription from the classics. - Cormac McCarthy, Blood Meridian
Reply
#4
Ruben,

Thus you think that the actual armor (if we assume that Augustus actually wore that musculata) was painted? In that case, the idea that the armors were made of precious metal is no longer necessary since they were painted and the material became irrelevant.

While I was in Rome, it was explained to me that the white color that was painted on the Augustus musculata suggested a "white" metal as is the case with silver. Thus possibly if Augustus wore this armor, it was of silver with those decorations in relief. Now wether the relief figures were directly beaten out of the breast plate or applied, I do not know. But it is an interesting point that they could have been painted. Those bright colors on silver would have been spectacular.
"You have to laugh at life or else what are you going to laugh at?" (Joseph Rosen)


Paolo
Reply
#5
Quote:Ruben,

Thus you think that the actual armor (if we assume that Augustus actually wore that musculata) was painted? In that case, the idea that the armors were made of precious metal is no longer necessary since they were painted and the material became irrelevant.

I don't quite think this is the case. The metal was still relevant both for its defensive qualities and because part of it would likely show through as well - on some of the shields depicted on the Agios Athanasios paintings, the rims and the raised portions seem to have been left bare.

Quote:While I was in Rome, it was explained to me that the white color that was painted on the Augustus musculata suggested a "white" metal as is the case with silver. Thus possibly if Augustus wore this armor, it was of silver with those decorations in relief. Now wether the relief figures were directly beaten out of the breast plate or applied, I do not know. But it is an interesting point that they could have been painted. Those bright colors on silver would have been spectacular.

The traces of painting suggest that much of the raised detail was painted, but that some was not, so it was almost certainly a combination of relief and paint, as the statue shows.
Ruben

He had with him the selfsame rifle you see with him now, all mounted in german silver and the name that he\'d give it set with silver wire under the checkpiece in latin: Et In Arcadia Ego. Common enough for a man to name his gun. His is the first and only ever I seen with an inscription from the classics. - Cormac McCarthy, Blood Meridian
Reply
#6
Well, if the metal is relevant for defensive purposes, silver would not really be a good choice. Thus we are left with bronze and brass that when cleaned and polished looked like gold. Do you think that the decoration was beaten out deirectly or applied?
"You have to laugh at life or else what are you going to laugh at?" (Joseph Rosen)


Paolo
Reply
#7
Quote:Well, if the metal is relevant for defensive purposes, silver would not really be a good choice.

Well, it likely wouldn't be entirely made of silver anyway. The armour would just be silvered or gilded bronze or iron.

Quote:Thus we are left with bronze and brass that when cleaned and polished looked like gold. Do you think that the decoration was beaten out deirectly or applied?

What do you mean by applied? I suspect that the decoration was beaten out directly and then painted.
Ruben

He had with him the selfsame rifle you see with him now, all mounted in german silver and the name that he\'d give it set with silver wire under the checkpiece in latin: Et In Arcadia Ego. Common enough for a man to name his gun. His is the first and only ever I seen with an inscription from the classics. - Cormac McCarthy, Blood Meridian
Reply
#8
Ruben,

Yes, I was thinking of the relief figures being cast and then applied somehow to the breastplate. I too think that they were beaten out. I would think however, that beating them out of copper alloy would be easier than iron. However, I do agree that a stronger material was used and covered with either silver or gold. That would be the only way it could be funtional.
"You have to laugh at life or else what are you going to laugh at?" (Joseph Rosen)


Paolo
Reply
#9
Ariston of the Philaidae (pottery fragment from British Museum)
Purple with silver or golden(??) edging.
Filthy rich or what?

Kind regards
Reply
#10
Quote:Ariston of the Philaidae (pottery fragment from British Museum)
Purple with silver or golden(??) edging.
Filthy rich or what?

This is clearly a representation of dyed leather and is just another example in the many instances of Greek and Roman leather armour. Smile
Author: Bronze Age Military Equipment, Pen & Sword Books
Reply
#11
Quote:This is clearly a representation of dyed leather and is just another example in the many instances of Greek and Roman leather armour. Smile

With purple leather greaves to match :!: :!: :!:
These filthy rich guys are full of fetishes :twisted:

kind regards
Reply
#12
Dan,

I know this has been discussed before. But since there are what appears to be several representations of leather armor that in certain instances appears to be painted, is it not possible that the Romans used leather armor even though we have only found metal based cuirasses?
"You have to laugh at life or else what are you going to laugh at?" (Joseph Rosen)


Paolo
Reply
#13
Quote: I know this has been discussed before. But since there are what appears to be several representations of leather armor that in certain instances appears to be painted
Where? How is it possible to determine whether an illustration is meant to be representing cloth, or leather?
Author: Bronze Age Military Equipment, Pen & Sword Books
Reply
#14
Dan,

Is this not what you wrote: "This is clearly a representation of dyed leather and is just another example in the many instances of Greek and Roman leather armour". So how can you tell that it is leather? Unless of course, you were trying to be facetious.
"You have to laugh at life or else what are you going to laugh at?" (Joseph Rosen)


Paolo
Reply
#15
you forgot to quote the Big Grin

Perhaps I should have used a :lol: or a :roll:

Stephanos understood :wink:

In case I haven't been clear before, any illustrations showing coloured armour could be interpreted in any manner that fits one's pet theory.
Author: Bronze Age Military Equipment, Pen & Sword Books
Reply


Forum Jump: