Posts: 24
Threads: 6
Joined: Aug 2009
Reputation:
0
Does anyone have an idea how the Latin phrase, "IN HOC SIGNO VINCES" would have appeared in the 4th Century? I believe the Latin is correct, but how would it have looked in the 4th Century? Thanks.
Marcellus Valerius Gothicus (aka Dave Dietrich)
Posts: 514
Threads: 7
Joined: Dec 2005
Reputation:
0
Can you just clarify for me - is it evidence of the phrase on standards you are after, are you sorting out the Greek/Latin descriptions of the vision, the scripts it might be written in?
One e.g.: A bronze coin of Vetranio in about AD 350 and one of Constantius II just after both minted in Siscia bear the labarum with the inscription Hoc Signo Victor Eris - which I think I'd put ‘With this sign you will be victor’, which is a slight variance from the usual Latin translation of Eusebius' Greek descripton of the vision '?? ????? ????', givinging "in this you will conquer".
Is that the sort of stuff?
Posts: 24
Threads: 6
Joined: Aug 2009
Reputation:
0
Visually how the Latin would have looked. For example, would the Latin looked something like: IN HOC SIGNO VINCES or IN.HOC.SIGNO.VINCES (with the dots actually higher) or INHOCSIGNOCVINCES (sans modern punctuation)? What I am trying to avoid is depicting the phrase in a modern version of Latin, rather than how it would have appeared in Antiquity.
I am asking because I want to put the phrase and a Chi Rho symbol on the back of my shield. Thanks again, Salvianus. Marcellus
Marcellus Valerius Gothicus (aka Dave Dietrich)