Posts: 3,817
Threads: 147
Joined: Dec 2001
Reputation:
2
Caligula's favoured gladiatorial match-up was a Thracian gladiator vs. a Murmillo gladiator. While this would have made for an interesting match-up on its own, it is purported that Caligula would remove certain sections of armour to make it more exciting for the crowd.
Is the above statement true? If so, where is it referenced?
Is there a gladiatorial group in PA somewhere? If so, anyone know how close to Canada they are?
____________________________________________________________
Magnus/Matt
Du Courage Viens La Verité
Legion: TBD
Posts: 1,189
Threads: 33
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation:
2
I've often wondered about this passage myself. The murmillones we are familiar with were already minimally protected. As defensive equipment they had a helmet, a shield, a very small greave on one leg and a manica. Did Caligula remove some of this? If so, what? Or, were the murmillones originally provided with more armor, and the ones we are familiar with of the post-Caligulan type?
Pecunia non olet
Posts: 735
Threads: 39
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation:
1
The scutum is a very good cover and you could even use it offensely, the only way to get around it is either to try to stab over the shoulder in the back or to make your opponent to open his cover. If you would take the scutum away then you had only your sword to continue the fight meaning you had to parry with it as well as doing your own attacks. This is of course a big disadvantage when fighting against a thraex who still carries a parmula. Before that, i.e. both carrying their shields and gladius/sica chances were of course equal for both to win or lose. But Caligula preferring thraeces wanted to make their chances better.