Rome versus Pyrrhus

[Epictetus]

Excellent! Previously, I had been swayed by T.J. Cornell. He argues (in part):

Indemnities began a regular feature of Roman military policy in the fourth century, and frequently entailed the requisitioning of military supplies, such as clothing and equipment, for the Roman army. This indicates that Roman soldiers were no longer serving at their own expense, but were receiving food and equipment, in addition to wages, as a regular condition of service. If this practice was already established in the 390s, as seems likely, it would be reasonable to connect it with the reforms of 406 BC. This conclusion is consistent with the hypothesis that from that time service in the legions was no longer the preserve of a wealthy group who could afford their own armour and weapons, but had been extended to all citizens who could meet a relatively modest property qualification.

Cornell, The Beginnings of Rome

(I had argued for this in the thread State issued equipment before the Marian reforms?, by the way.)

But now I think you have me convinced, Steven. Once again, excellent research and excellent post.