Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rome in decline in 100AD! Byzantium in 400AD! Ugh!!!
#16
Yet again, we only get one core from an oil well and have to make decisions based on the results....... :wink:
Visne partem mei capere? Comminus agamus! * Me semper rogo, Quid faceret Iulius Caesar? * Confidence is a good thing! Overconfidence is too much of a good thing.
[b]Legio XIIII GMV. (Q. Magivs)RMRS Remember Atuatuca! Vengence will be ours!
Titus Flavius Germanus
Batavian Coh I
Byron Angel
Reply
#17
My main issues with this are that there were multiple strands involved in the decline of the Roman Empire, of which everyone reading this is probably aware. Also, the Eastern Roman Empire was actually on the up in the 5th century, as testified by an increase in trade, refurbishment of many cities and the building of new ports.
R. Cornelius hadrianus, Guvnor of Homunculum, the 15mm scale Colonia. Proof that size does not matter.

R. Neil Harrison
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Corruption and the decline of Rome Lothia 6 1,356 01-16-2019, 09:05 AM
Last Post: Justin I
  Aelian and Roman Tactics 100AD? Anonymous 15 4,507 07-18-2007, 03:04 PM
Last Post: ywanell
  What would a Primus Pilus in 400AD Britain wear? Fhyn 5 1,891 03-10-2007, 09:03 PM
Last Post: Fhyn

Forum Jump: