Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Was the leather muscled curiass of the later times sexier?
#13
Quote:Steven,
could you please state your sources and references? I would like to read the primary sources myself.
Thanks

The opinion on armor for late Roman armor, originates from "Late Roman Infantrymen". Warrior series No. 9, Osprey books.

The story about the Saxon army lightening their armor and arms, is under the select Fyrd description in Ian Heath's, "Armies of the dark ages 600-1066". A wargames research publication.

As I say monumental evidence reveals the comon use leather cuirass. Unless of course all roman infantry had given up the segmenta in favor of bronze or iron cuirasses. And that is what is depicted.

A lot of monumental evidence reveals no armor. But I'd assume that the majority of Late Roman close infantry. Wore some type of leather or textile undergarment beneath their chain mail.
Steven.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Was the leather muscled curiass of the later times sexier? - by wulfgar60 - 11-03-2008, 03:07 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Muscled Cuirasses of Boiled Leather? Lindsay_Powell 16 4,760 07-17-2010, 10:31 AM
Last Post: MARCvSVIBIvSMAvRINvS

Forum Jump: