Jurjen wrote:
Quote:For a centurion of the pretiorian guard, I would say NO. As it seems to me that the Praetorians are full of traditions. (They also stay by the old scutum fashion, when normal legionairies getting more square ones)
Whilst I would agree generally with Jurjen, and others,
that the plain fact is, we just don't know, a cautionary note should sounded here about conclusions drawn from a couple of sculptures, say, as here.
The sculptures here in question are a relief from the Louvre (circa 50-60 A.D.) which shows Praetorians in high relief carrying 'old style' republican oval shields, and wearing 'old style'crested 'Attic' helmets, but as Byron has pointed out they seem to have'modern' circular bosses on their shields, and the shields themselves are too small compared to actual examples of republican shields. ( but we can't even be sure of this since sculptors habitually made shields smaller than they really were to avoid obscuring the figures too much - see Trajan's column, for example)
The Authenticity Police of those times would surely have disapproved !!
ALL the men seem to be wearing 'muscled cuirasses', some covered up. However, this sculpture is heavily restored since being unearthed. All the heads for example are based on the only surviving head....the low relief one in the background. There are at least three shield designs depicted, possibly four. One possible interpretation is that the High Relief three figures who obviously wear 'muscled cuirasses' are 'officers' - centurions or above, and whose
original helmets
may have had transverse crests. ( impossible to say since the original heads did not survive). The different shield designs MAY indicate different cohorts, and the figures in 'muscled cuirasses' Cohort Commanders but one suspects that 'modern' restoration may, as with the helmets, be at work.
The second sculpture is called the Cancellaria relief. It is in excellent condition and intact, because it dates from around the end of Domitian's reign, but was never used because he was assassinated.This would date it to c. 96 A.D.
It shows Praetorians in 'undress' i.e. with no armour or helmet, but armed.
The shield patterns here are the same as one another, and the shields are again 'old fashioned' Republican oval types, again smaller than the originals on which they are based but the one visible boss seems to the correct 'barleycorn' type ( which throws suspicion of 'restoration' on the Louvre example).
Unfortunately for the hypothesis that Praetorians wore 'Traditional Old Fashioned gear', the next depictions of them, from the reign of Trajan, show them in the Dacian Wars (AD 101-102,105-106) wearing the 'latest' styles of equipment, including Helmets and rectangular Shields, just a few years after the Cancellaria relief! ( see Trajan's Column, The Adamklissi metopes etc)
Because of this, Peter Connolly hypothesised that Praetorians wore 'Traditional' gear on Parade in Rome, but the latest equipment for Battle. ( though other explanations are possible)
For a modern example of this, see the British Queen's Guards Regiments, who wear 'old fashioned' Bearskins and Red Jackets ( though again the Authenticity Police would disapprove...the uniforms are of a modern cut, rather than historical! ) for ceremonial duties in London, but the latest battle kit in the field........
As you see, therefore, we don't have that much evidence and what we do have is riddled with uncertainty, sometimes inaccurate in itself, and sometimes contradictory!!
We also have very few depictions of Centurions from
any period ( just a few tombstones), so no-one can say at all whether Centurions wore 'segmentata' or not....all one can say is that no clear depiction of a Centurion wearing one has
yet come to light.....
No-one therefore could criticise fairly a depiction of a Centurion in segmentata......