I was wondering if the Roman army had midgets so the enemy can't see them. Maybe they were placed in the center of the army so they could hide or something like that?
Thanks for the answers in advance.
Posts: 7,668
Threads: 117
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation:
0
The short answer (couldn't resist) is
NO.
Welcome to the forum, and while there may not be long discussion on this topic, there are discussions on many topics and subjects, so enjoy browsing around and reading what people have to say.
By the way, a forum rule is to add your real name to your signature. Did you read the Rules of RAT? There is a link below. Please do.
M. Demetrius Abicio
(David Wills)
Saepe veritas est dura.
Posts: 4,483
Threads: 634
Joined: Aug 2005
Reputation:
0
According to Vegetius, a recruit had to be five feet ten inches tall, although he admits that short soldiers could be fine too, quoting Homer, Iliad 5.801.
Jona Lendering
Relevance is the enemy of history
My website
Posts: 180
Threads: 13
Joined: Feb 2008
Reputation:
0
1'64 meters more or less, not a midget :lol: :lol:
What is true is that in some cases (Caesar en Farsalos for example), They hide some soldiers behind cavalry for frighten the enemy cavalry and for punched a good knock to them.
Mateo González Vázquez
LEGIO VIIII HISPANA 8) <img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_cool.gif" alt="8)" title="Cool" />8)
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.legioviiii.es">www.legioviiii.es
Posts: 630
Threads: 42
Joined: Jan 2007
Reputation:
0
You'd get a funny shaped testudo
Memmia AKA Joanne Wenlock.
Friends of Letocetum
Posts: 68
Threads: 4
Joined: Apr 2008
Reputation:
0
What was the average height for a Roman?
I always thought that anything much over 6 foot was quite abnormal in Rome.
AKA Travis S.
Posts: 13,277
Threads: 102
Joined: May 2006
Reputation:
3
6' roman is about 5'7" modern.....
Visne partem mei capere? Comminus agamus! * Me semper rogo, Quid faceret Iulius Caesar? * Confidence is a good thing! Overconfidence is too much of a good thing.
[b]Legio XIIII GMV. (Q. Magivs)RMRS Remember Atuatuca! Vengence will be ours!
Titus Flavius Germanus
Batavian Coh I
Byron Angel
Posts: 180
Threads: 13
Joined: Feb 2008
Reputation:
0
Quote:What was the average height for a Roman?
I always thought that anything much over 6 foot was quite abnormal in Rome.
It depends of the region I think and for that I think that an average height doesn't say a lot...
It happens the same with horses I think...
Mateo González Vázquez
LEGIO VIIII HISPANA 8) <img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_cool.gif" alt="8)" title="Cool" />8)
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.legioviiii.es">www.legioviiii.es
Posts: 2,253
Threads: 31
Joined: Jan 2001
Reputation:
0
Six Roman feet is actually about 5'10" modern. Vegetius was giving requirements for the first cohort, and said that you could drop a couple inches off if the recruit was in good health (so 5'10" Roman or 5'8" modern). He doesn't specify anything for the rest of the army. And of course, being Vegetius, we don't know if he is quoting a regulation from his time, a regulation from before his time, or simply his own wishful thinking.
As I recall, the data I've seen indicates a male average height of somewhere around 5'6", more or less. This isn't bad, since modern American male height is only around 5'9". And it's probably safe to assume that soldiers averaged an inch or so more than civilians, since they would tend to be the stronger, healthier specimens.
I remember seeing sillohuettes in the Smithsonian years ago claiming that average height for a male Gaul was 5'10"! So they were big guys! Of course, if that's mostly from aristocratic graves, the lower classes weren't necessarily that tall. But the body in the well at Velsen (with the really spiffy pugio scabbard) was 6'4".
Never heard of any dwarfs in the Roman army! Midgets could probably make a lot more money, more safely, in some other line of work.
Valete,
Matthew
Matthew Amt (Quintus)
Legio XX, USA
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.larp.com/legioxx/">http://www.larp.com/legioxx/
Posts: 1,568
Threads: 207
Joined: Jul 2001
Reputation:
0
11.65 modern inches to the Roman Foot.
Hibernicus
LEGIO IX HISPANA, USA
You cannot dig ditches in a toga!
[url:194jujcw]http://www.legio-ix-hispana.org[/url]
A nationwide club with chapters across N America
Posts: 8,090
Threads: 505
Joined: Jan 2005
Reputation:
0
I did a fair bit of looking into the whole height/stature issue a while back, and the average Roman was between 5'5" and 5'8", based on skeletal remains.
TARBICvS/Jim Bowers
A A A DESEDO DESEDO!