06-03-2008, 06:48 AM
I broadly agree with what Crispvs says. Spathas have been categorised into different classes dependant upon size and presumed use. Basically some are more adapted to thrusting, than cutting. But such definitions should not mask the fact that the spatha is at best a cut and thrust weapon, and at worst just for cutting. I agree with Crispvs.
This allows training fights to be put on using blunt spathas, and indeed the capped spears. Both mentioned by Vegetius. Something which is safe and authentic.
As an aside I do remember a mock battle in York between 1st century legionaries and Vikings. I'm pleased to report the Romans won, hopefully due to their superior close quarters thrusting technique!
This allows training fights to be put on using blunt spathas, and indeed the capped spears. Both mentioned by Vegetius. Something which is safe and authentic.
As an aside I do remember a mock battle in York between 1st century legionaries and Vikings. I'm pleased to report the Romans won, hopefully due to their superior close quarters thrusting technique!
John Conyard
York
A member of Comitatus Late Roman
Reconstruction Group
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.comitatus.net">http://www.comitatus.net
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.historicalinterpretations.net">http://www.historicalinterpretations.net
<a class="postlink" href="http://lateantiquearchaeology.wordpress.com">http://lateantiquearchaeology.wordpress.com
York
A member of Comitatus Late Roman
Reconstruction Group
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.comitatus.net">http://www.comitatus.net
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.historicalinterpretations.net">http://www.historicalinterpretations.net
<a class="postlink" href="http://lateantiquearchaeology.wordpress.com">http://lateantiquearchaeology.wordpress.com