Posts: 3,234
Threads: 230
Joined: May 2004
Reputation:
1
Salvete,
What ranks could receive phalerae as a decoration. Could a signifer or a vexillarius wear phalerae?
I've seen depictions of the centurio and the aquilifer with phalerae, but I'm not sure what other ranks could wear them.
Valete,
Jef Pinceel
a.k.a.
Marcvs Mvmmivs Falco
LEG XI CPF vzw
>Q SER FEST
www.LEGIOXI.be
Posts: 39
Threads: 23
Joined: Jan 2008
Reputation:
0
I'm sure that all soldiers could receive them, but I think they were only worn on parade. As for battles, centurions wore them on their chests.
Nicholas De Oppresso Liber
[i]“It is not death that a man should fear, but he should fear never beginning to live.â€
Posts: 39
Threads: 23
Joined: Jan 2008
Reputation:
0
Okay, my reference is Adrian Goldsworthy's The Complete Roman Army.
Centurions and aquilifiers were known to where decorations in battle. A tombstone shows a legionary holding the eagle (Aquilifier) covered in decorations (2 torcs and 9 phalarae).
The other legionaries would wear theirs on parades, pay parades, etc, etc.
Nicholas De Oppresso Liber
[i]“It is not death that a man should fear, but he should fear never beginning to live.â€
Posts: 326
Threads: 7
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation:
0
I'm not aware of any evidence that suggests only centurions and aquilifers could wear decorations, whether phalerae or anything else, in battle. I've recently argued that because of the militaristic nature of Roman society and the monetary value of many of these awards, all Roman soldiers were likely to have worn their decorations in battle, (“Display in Roman Warfare: The appearance of armies and individuals on the battlefieldâ€
Posts: 2,784
Threads: 313
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation:
1
Display in Roman Warfare: The appearance of armies and individuals on the battlefieldâ€
Posts: 8,090
Threads: 505
Joined: Jan 2005
Reputation:
0
Caballo - PB\\n[quote]Display in Roman Warfare: The appearance of armies and individuals on the battlefieldâ€
TARBICvS/Jim Bowers
A A A DESEDO DESEDO!
Posts: 326
Threads: 7
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation:
0
The current 'school of thought' in academic circles is that individual auxiliaries didn't receive the same kinds of bravery decorations as the legionaries, as Adrian says. The principal proponent of this argument is D.B.Saddington. I would like to argue to the contrary, partly for the heck of it ( :lol: ) and partly because I don't see there being such a significant difference in status of legionaries / auxiliaries, particularly as the empire developed. But there's not a huge amount of evidence either way.