04-04-2008, 01:23 PM
Quote: I did not contend that the archaeology can give us an exact number, merely that it is "consistent with" a nominal 80 per century,Presumably, had one a text saying the a century numbered 100 men, one could squeeze an extra man into the rooms, consistent with the archaeological evidence?
Second or third century is IMHO a bit late to call "Early Imperial."
Dan Diffendale
Ph.D. candidate, University of Michigan
Ph.D. candidate, University of Michigan