11-07-2007, 01:40 PM
Maybe all the historians out there didn't make much of a fuss is because they weren't touched by the statement that history was not a science as they did not feel threatened or diminished :roll: .
That I, a practicing physcist, think what I think is because I have more than an idea of what physics and natural sciences are about. As a lover and reader of history and appreciator of historians I like to think I have an idea of what historians do. I entered this thread because someone else started it and also because it has popped up before, not because I wished to throw a stone and see the waves it would make.
That I, a practicing physcist, think what I think is because I have more than an idea of what physics and natural sciences are about. As a lover and reader of history and appreciator of historians I like to think I have an idea of what historians do. I entered this thread because someone else started it and also because it has popped up before, not because I wished to throw a stone and see the waves it would make.
Jeffery Wyss
"Si vos es non secui of solutio tunc vos es secui of preciptate."
"Si vos es non secui of solutio tunc vos es secui of preciptate."
