11-07-2007, 11:38 AM
Science was once "Natural Philosophy," does this make science identical to the study of Plato and John Stuart Mill or Descartes? An etymological roundabout doesn't really get us anywhere.
History is not a science, in the accepted modern meaning of the term, because it is fundamentally not amenable to experimental proof.
A hypothesis in history can be supported by written or other evidence, but it cannot be proven by it. Written evidence is particularly debatable due to the possiblilty of bias or mendacity in the writer.
History is not a science, in the accepted modern meaning of the term, because it is fundamentally not amenable to experimental proof.
A hypothesis in history can be supported by written or other evidence, but it cannot be proven by it. Written evidence is particularly debatable due to the possiblilty of bias or mendacity in the writer.
Martin
Fac me cocleario vomere!
Fac me cocleario vomere!