10-31-2007, 04:14 PM
Firstly, thanks for opinions!
Now I’m puzzling again… in the past I had argued that there were few plain pugios and most were ornate (in my pervious posts). Other members told me I was wrong back then and stated that they had spoken to museum curators and that the ornate pugios get all the press and get placed on display… but there are boxes of plain ones sitting in the basement. In other posts I had members telling me that I was wrong about all the decorated ornate pugios I was seeing when I argued against the new Deepeeka “Plain Pugioâ€
Quote:"But back to the number and layers of Pteruges... the basis was the same for why we see many ornate pugio scabbards but, there are many more plain ones… the cost."
Do you have evidence to back this amazing statement up?
Now I’m puzzling again… in the past I had argued that there were few plain pugios and most were ornate (in my pervious posts). Other members told me I was wrong back then and stated that they had spoken to museum curators and that the ornate pugios get all the press and get placed on display… but there are boxes of plain ones sitting in the basement. In other posts I had members telling me that I was wrong about all the decorated ornate pugios I was seeing when I argued against the new Deepeeka “Plain Pugioâ€
Vale!
Antonivs Marivs Congianocvs
aka_ANTH0NY_C0NGIAN0
My ancient coin collection:
[url:3lgwsbe7]http://www.congiano.com/MyCoins/index.htm[/url]
Antonivs Marivs Congianocvs
aka_ANTH0NY_C0NGIAN0
My ancient coin collection:
[url:3lgwsbe7]http://www.congiano.com/MyCoins/index.htm[/url]
