Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Testudo
#31
Yeah, the rocks would definately hurt. But, if the person in front of you is a bit taller, it's hard not to rest your shield on their head. Makes you wonder how they sorted out the ranks in terms of height, if at all.

Hey PMBardunias, can you add your real name to your signature? Thanks!

To answer your question, the diameter of the boss (the part that is domed) at least on my scutum, isn't a lot bigger than the hole that is cut out for the hand. BUT, having said that, because my hand is in the middle of this hole, I have a good 2-3 inches of clearance above and below my hand.

So as long as the shields were of equal size, then the person who was holding the shield on top would be ok. But, if his shield was a bit smaller, symetrical or not he may have a problem. I'm not sure we know how uniform the scuta were within a century/cohort. You would think things would work better if they were the same dimensions, but that may have not been the case. I guess they would have improvised and adapted as necessary.
____________________________________________________________
Magnus/Matt
Du Courage Viens La Verité

Legion: TBD
Reply
#32
Quote:Hey PMBardunias, can you add your real name to your signature? Thanks!

I think I have done so successfully, we'll soon see. :lol:

I thank you all, but I think some of you are misunderstanding the formation I am describing. It is not the testudo you have pictured, with one shield held vertical and the other horizontal over head. It seems to consist of a line of at least two shields overlapping, both held vertically. The top resting on the boss beneath it. Elsewhere the author seems to describe a closed fomation where shields overlapped laterally shield edge to shield boss- which seem difficult with the more hemicylindrical scutii. This would look like a barrel tiled roof.

If any of you have a friend and a pair of scuttii, try this and see what happens.
Paul M. Bardunias
MODERATOR: [url:2dqwu8yc]http://www.romanarmytalk.com/rat/viewtopic.php?t=4100[/url]
A Spartan, being asked a question, answered "No." And when the questioner said, "You lie," the Spartan said, "You see, then, that it is stupid of you to ask questions to which you already know the answer!"
Reply
#33
Quote:So as long as the shields were of equal size, then the person who was holding the shield on top would be ok. But, if his shield was a bit smaller, symetrical or not he may have a problem. I'm not sure we know how uniform the scuta were within a century/cohort.
There's a primary reference to a legionary being either punished or castigated for having a different scutum to the rest of his unit, as he wouldn't be able to protect his neighbours. Now this whole discussion of the testudo puts a very focused reasoning behind the reaction to his shield.
TARBICvS/Jim Bowers
A A A DESEDO DESEDO!
Reply
#34
Quote:
Magnus:3kmfoz4t Wrote:So as long as the shields were of equal size, then the person who was holding the shield on top would be ok. But, if his shield was a bit smaller, symetrical or not he may have a problem. I'm not sure we know how uniform the scuta were within a century/cohort.
There's a primary reference to a legionary being either punished or castigated for having a different scutum to the rest of his unit, as he wouldn't be able to protect his neighbours. Now this whole discussion of the testudo puts a very focused reasoning behind the reaction to his shield.

What is the source for this Jim? Very interesting.
Jef Pinceel
a.k.a.
Marcvs Mvmmivs Falco

LEG XI CPF vzw
>Q SER FEST
www.LEGIOXI.be
Reply
#35
Thanks, Jim. That's exactly why I brough this up. I didn't think anyone working on this had noticed the implication.
Paul M. Bardunias
MODERATOR: [url:2dqwu8yc]http://www.romanarmytalk.com/rat/viewtopic.php?t=4100[/url]
A Spartan, being asked a question, answered "No." And when the questioner said, "You lie," the Spartan said, "You see, then, that it is stupid of you to ask questions to which you already know the answer!"
Reply
#36
It was around 100 BC, and the legionary's shield was too large. The fact that it was too large indicates it would have been fine for protecting the man to his left, so it being useless for a testudo is a tantalising possibility for the punishment.

I've mentioned it before (wrongly thinking he was executed). Perhaps Matt Amt can recall the episode now? :wink:
http://www.romanarmy.com/rat/viewtopic. ... 1032#91032
TARBICvS/Jim Bowers
A A A DESEDO DESEDO!
Reply
#37
Cool info Jim. Makes sense.

Check your pm's...that point you raise makes me think of something else.
____________________________________________________________
Magnus/Matt
Du Courage Viens La Verité

Legion: TBD
Reply
#38
I think the formation which was being asked about was an anti-archery formation rather than what we normally think of as a testudo.

Crispvs
Who is called \'\'Paul\'\' by no-one other than his wife, parents and brothers.  :!: <img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_exclaim.gif" alt=":!:" title="Exclamation" />:!:

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.romanarmy.net">www.romanarmy.net
Reply
#39
That or wasn't it that anti-cavalry one similar?
____________________________________________________________
Magnus/Matt
Du Courage Viens La Verité

Legion: TBD
Reply
#40
Quote:It was around 100 BC, and the legionary's shield was too large. The fact that it was too large indicates it would have been fine for protecting the man to his left, so it being useless for a testudo is a tantalising possibility for the punishment

I suspect this is the apocryphal story told of Scipio Africanus"noticing the shield of a certain soldier rather elaborately decorated (told elsewhere as over-sized shield) rebuked him, saying he didn't wonder the man had adorned it with such care( or it was over-sized), seeing that he put more trust in it than his sword." Frontinus, Stratagems IV.1.5 - the tale is also referred to by Plutarch, Livy and Polyaenus. Smile
"dulce et decorum est pro patria mori " - Horace
(It is a sweet and proper thing to die for ones country)

"No son-of-a-bitch ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country" - George C Scott as General George S. Patton
Paul McDonnell-Staff
Reply


Forum Jump: