Posts: 4,483
Threads: 634
Joined: Aug 2005
Reputation:
0
On several occasions, I have read that the Pagans accused the Christians of incest and cannibalism. The first accusation is a misunderstanding of the Christian custom to call each other brother and sister, the second accusation is a misunderstanding of the nature of the eucharist.
But what is the source for this accusation? Most Pagan writings are lost; so, it is likely that we know of this accusation because a Christian author refuted it. But which one?
Jona Lendering
Relevance is the enemy of history
My website
Posts: 123
Threads: 12
Joined: May 2011
Reputation:
18
The Passion of the Martyrs of Lugdunum, preserved by Eusebius (Church History, 5.1.14) suggests that the Christians in AD 177 were accused by pagan slaves of "Thyestean feasts and "Oedipal intercourse."
Posts: 152
Threads: 4
Joined: Oct 2010
Reputation:
0
There are actually lots of references. I've found some more even earlier ones:
The Apology of Justin the Martyr (Apol I, 26) of the mid 2nd century also mentions: "[P]romiscuous intercourse, and...meals of human flesh".
Pliny (Letters X, 96) also says "it was their custom to ... partake of food--but ordinary and innocent food", possibly implying that he'd heard the accusations of cannibalism too.
Hello, my name is Harry.
Posts: 7,668
Threads: 117
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation:
0
And yet, accusation and allegation are not proofs.
Some of the misconception about Christian cannibalism comes from a passage in John 6:56 (Jesus speaking) "He who eats My flesh and drinks My blood abides in Me, and I in him". He is speaking metaphorically about an event called Communion, or the taking of the Sacraments. It amounts to eating a small piece of bread and a sip of wine, in memory of Jesus' having given himself in sacrifice. But eating bread and wine is nothing newly introduced, as that goes back as far as bread and wine are known.
Those who knew nothing of Christianity and wanted to detract from it created and spread the legend that Christians cannibalize someone and drank their blood in a ceremony called "the blood of the lamb". The allegation is false, of course, yet it persists.
There are many such false allegations about many religions.
I'm not sure about the incest part, unless it has something to do with the Christian practice of calling fellow believers with the appellation "Brother/Sister"...in which case, one would marry brothers and sisters. But Jewish people in older times called each other bretheren, too, as do people from some other religions.
Remember, the admonition not to drink blood is still a Biblical mandate, both in the Hebrew and Greek sections of the Bible. So clearly, that is a metaphor, too. It is similar in intent to the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, another legend that is intended to slander Jewish people.
M. Demetrius Abicio
(David Wills)
Saepe veritas est dura.
Posts: 213
Threads: 6
Joined: Jan 2011
Reputation:
0
There might be a too-literal translation as well. The Latin "incestum" meant any unlawful sexual intercourse. Sex with a Vestal, for instance, was "incestum."
Posts: 7,668
Threads: 117
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation:
0
It's always easy to believe the worst about people you don't like, or those who don't fit into your political ambition, isn't it?
M. Demetrius Abicio
(David Wills)
Saepe veritas est dura.