Posts: 7,668
Threads: 117
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation:
0
You can move many more men on a bridge in much shorter time than by boats. If I recall that situation, the river was at flood stage. That would mean boat crossing would be more dangerous than normal.
Consider the cavalry. Boats full of horses? Nope. Anyway, they finished that bridge so fast the Germanic enemies were utterly surprised. I think they remarked that it had taken them twice the time to cross using boats, or something like that.
Amazingly, the Romans tore the bridge down when they left. Today, they'd charge toll to cross over, and sell postcards and such.
M. Demetrius Abicio
(David Wills)
Saepe veritas est dura.
Posts: 13,279
Threads: 102
Joined: May 2006
Reputation:
3
Ditto to that.
Visne partem mei capere? Comminus agamus! * Me semper rogo, Quid faceret Iulius Caesar? * Confidence is a good thing! Overconfidence is too much of a good thing.
[b]Legio XIIII GMV. (Q. Magivs)RMRS Remember Atuatuca! Vengence will be ours!
Titus Flavius Germanus
Batavian Coh I
Byron Angel
Posts: 148
Threads: 28
Joined: Oct 2003
Reputation:
0
Safer or not, wasn't the main point of the bridge to awe the germans? A boat crossing would have been expected. What shock the germans must have felt to know their enemy constructed an entire bridge, used it, and demolished it in such a short time.
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.redrampant.com">www.redrampant.com
Posts: 1,513
Threads: 210
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation:
1
There are other instances of Caesar using boats to cross rivers in the Gallic War. He didn't build bridges whenever he wanted to move his army from one bank to the other. So crossing the Rhine was different. Perhaps it was its size?
There was also another instance of some bad luck with a boat crossing. In 1.12 he surprises the Helvetti crossing by a bridge of boats and massacres a portion of their army. Caesar then built a bridge (1.13) for himself, but the text doesn't make clear if it is another bridge of boats or one like he would later build over the Rhine.
Here he boasts about speed again. It took the Helvetti 20 days to cross but only 1 day for him.
Posts: 184
Threads: 1
Joined: May 2008
Reputation:
0
Quote:Safer or not, wasn't the main point of the bridge to awe the germans? A boat crossing would have been expected. What shock the germans must have felt to know their enemy constructed an entire bridge, used it, and demolished it in such a short time.
Yes i heard that too,it was a kind of "shock and awe" tactic to prove their superiority.
Out of sight of subject shores, we kept even our eyes free from the defilement of tyranny. We, the most distant dwellers upon earth, the last of the free, have been shielded till today by our very remoteness and by the obscurity in which it has shrouded our name.
Calgacus The Swordsman, Mons Grapius 84 AD.
Name:Michael Hayes
Posts: 13,279
Threads: 102
Joined: May 2006
Reputation:
3
Yes, the speed of his building the bridge, running with impunity on the other side of the Rhine, then returning and demolishing the bridge features quite prominently in his commentaries.
Visne partem mei capere? Comminus agamus! * Me semper rogo, Quid faceret Iulius Caesar? * Confidence is a good thing! Overconfidence is too much of a good thing.
[b]Legio XIIII GMV. (Q. Magivs)RMRS Remember Atuatuca! Vengence will be ours!
Titus Flavius Germanus
Batavian Coh I
Byron Angel