Posts: 186
Threads: 43
Joined: Aug 2006
Reputation:
0
How much does the segmentata and the muscled cuirass restrict upper body movement? Not so much the arms as the torso itself.
Many thanks!
"There are some who call me... Tim..."
Sic vis pacem, para bellum
Exitus acta probat
Nemo saltat sobrius
Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori
Fortes Fortuna Aduvat
"The enemy outnumber us a paltry three to one! Good odds for any Greek!"
Posts: 655
Threads: 67
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
0
It really does not restrict.
I have done grass drills , pila and gladius demonstrations as well needle felt combat. Was never restricted in the torso or the shoulder region.
Now, if you go to sit down and have something to eat around the camp fire, you are a bit stiff in the torso when to eating and reaching around for stuff like your spoon and canteen.
The segmentata that I used to own was well made, so I did not even bust a buckle or strap amazingly enough.
Hope this sheds a tiny bit of light,
v/r
Mike
Mike Daniels
a.k.a
Titus Minicius Parthicus
Legio VI FFC.
If not me...who?
If not now...when?
:wink: <img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_wink.gif" alt=":wink:" title="Wink" />:wink:
Posts: 3,234
Threads: 230
Joined: May 2004
Reputation:
1
Indeed, a seg isn't very restrictive in movement when walking around or fighting. Sittings down in it is quite annoying!
I think a musculata will have the same problems, perhaps even more so.
Jef Pinceel
a.k.a.
Marcvs Mvmmivs Falco
LEG XI CPF vzw
>Q SER FEST
www.LEGIOXI.be
Posts: 2,784
Threads: 313
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation:
1
"I think a musculata will have the same problems, perhaps even more so." I wore a musculata to a fancy dress party over Christmas- sitting, walking, dancing etc- no problem. My only issue was having to hold on to my gladius and pugio while pogoing to a favourite punk song......
Cheers
Caballo
Posts: 2,253
Threads: 31
Joined: Jan 2001
Reputation:
0
Actually, a muscled cuirass made for action was shorter than a segmentata, precisely to avoid restriction of movement. It ends at about where you bend! You have to ignore the embossed "anatomy" since that won't correspond to the wearer's body parts. Travis Clark is the person to ask about this, though--it's quite possible that many later cuirasses were a bit longer and more restrictive of bending, since they weren't really intended for front-line troops.
A solid cuirass is surprisingly narrow across the chest, too. Point both arms forward horizontally, and the space between them is what gets covered.
So being narrow and short, it's no wonder that surviving examples are always viewed as being "small" or "child-sized". They aren't, of course, they just don't cover as much as some folks expect. Because you have to be able to move!
Matthew
Matthew Amt (Quintus)
Legio XX, USA
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.larp.com/legioxx/">http://www.larp.com/legioxx/
Posts: 8,090
Threads: 505
Joined: Jan 2005
Reputation:
0
Quote:So being narrow and short, it's no wonder that surviving examples are always viewed as being "small" or "child-sized". They aren't, of course, they just don't cover as much as some folks expect. Because you have to be able to move!
That one in the British Museum from Italy is mighty narrow in the waist, and the depth front to back is oh so very small. People were definitely tiny compared to today.
TARBICvS/Jim Bowers
A A A DESEDO DESEDO!