Posts: 1,313
Threads: 193
Joined: Apr 2006
Reputation:
4
Quote:Very few tests against mail resembles the stuff that was worn historically. Generally the links are too large, the riveting inadequate, and the backing material unsuitable.
Ok. Lets get to business. This is about the constrcution of the lorica hamata used in the test I gave the link above:
General introduction:
1. Kettenpanzer lorica hamata
Bezüglich der Herstellung von Kettenpanzern nach römischem Vorbild sei auf die Arbeit von David Sim in Britannia, Vol.XXVIII, 1997 verwiesen.
D.Sim weist in seinem Experiment an gestanzten und anschließend über einem Leerdorn durch Hämmern kalibrierten Ringen einen Anstieg der Härte von ursprünglich 146 HV auf 210 HV nach. Diese Zunahme der Härte um rund 25% ist auf die mechanische Maßnahme der sogen. Kaltverfestigung zurückzuführen. Mikroskopische Untersuchungen an gestanzten Originalringen aus Nydam (187 HV) und Thorsberg (191 HV) belegen durch identische Hammerspuren an den Außenkanten und Quetschungen des grobkörnigen Stanzgefüges an den Innenkannten, eine offenbar identische Materialbearbeitung wie im Experiment.
Gebogene und anschließend vernietete Ringe wurden bereits in der Antike aus Draht hergestellt. Als Ausgangsmaterial verwendete man das relativ weiche und damit für den Ziehvorgang hervorragend geeignete Schmiedeeisen. Dieses, in Rennfeuertechnik aus sogen. "Luppen" gewonnene Rohmaterial wurde durch einen allerdings sehr arbeitsintensiven Schmiedeprozeß von Schlacken befreit und soweit verfeinert (raffiniert), bis in seinem Inneren eine langfaserige, strähnige Struktur entstand. Der eigentliche Ziehvorgang gestaltete sich sodann folgendermaßen: Nachdem man aus dem zuvor genannten Rohmaterial dünne Eisenstäbe mit einem Durchmesser von ca. 5 mm geschmiedet hat, werden diese erneut ausgeglüht, sauber gebürstet, an der Luft abgekühlt und anschließend mit Bienenwachs oder Rinderfett eingerieben. Danach erfolgt das Ziehen der Stäbe durch die Löcher einer sogen. Ziehplatte. Die Perforationen dieser Eisenplatte sind leicht konisch ausgebildet und weisen abnehmende Durchmesser auf. Das konsekutive Ziehen der anfangs noch recht kräftigen Eisenstäbe durch die sich kontinuierlich verjüngenden Löcher der Ziehplatte führt letztlich zur entstehung eines Drahtes von beliebiger Dicke. D.Sim konnte in seinen Versuchen einen Anstieg der Vickers-Härte bei ausgeglühtem (normalisiertem) Grundmaterial von initial 100 HV auf 159 HV nach dem Ziehvorgang feststellen. In Anbetracht der Tatsache, daß die Drahtherstellung in der Antike mit hoher Wahrscheinlichkeit nach dem gleichen Prozedere abgelaufen ist wie oben beschrieben wurde, kann auch von den gleichen Härtewerten beim Endprodukt, dem vernieteten Ring ausgegangen werden. Demgegenüber weist das von uns verwendete, moderne Material eine um ca. 25% höhere Härte auf (211 HV). Es kann allerdings unterstellt werden, daß bei den Drahtringen die Härte des Ringanteiles von untergeordneter Bedeutung ist, da sich der Nietbereich als entscheidend für die Widerstandskraft gegenüber Gewalteinwirkung gezeigt hat.
Die für die gestanzten Ringe gemessene Härte von 185 HV korreliert sehr gut mit den von Sim ermittelten Werten.[/code]
Hamata used:
Als `lorica hamata' benutzen wir ein 20x20 cm großes Geflecht aus abwechselnd gestanzten und vernieteten Kettenringen, in der Größe ( gestanzte Ringe: 9/6 mm Durchmesser, Dicke 1.2 mm, vernietete Ringe: 10/9 mm ). Die Unterpanzerung für das Kettenhemd (thoracomachus) bestand aus mit Roßhaar bis zu max. 1.5 cm Dicke aufgefüttertem, gestepptem Leinenstoff. Bild
Für den Beschuß wurden die Replikate auf Strohballen befestigt.
Pic of the Hamata used:
Stefan (Literary references to the discussed topics are always appreciated.)
Posts: 1,313
Threads: 193
Joined: Apr 2006
Reputation:
4
Quote:Vendtidius routed the Parthians with slingers, not archers...
Johnny
Really? Could you provide sources, please?
Stefan (Literary references to the discussed topics are always appreciated.)
Posts: 228
Threads: 30
Joined: May 2005
Reputation:
0
Quote:Hi,
I think it's a little bit different, when you are shooting from 5 m distance or from 100 m distance.
Greetings
Alexandr
When the enemy were only 5m away I'd have said that it was a bit late for shooting :?
Carus Andiae - David Woodall
"The greatest military machine in the history of the universe..."
"What is - the Daleks?"
"No... the Romans!" - Doctor Who: The Pandorica Opens
Posts: 444
Threads: 100
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation:
1
Cassius Dio
I think books xlviii-xlix.
I'll check this afternoon, my copy is at home!
Johnny
Johnny Shumate
Posts: 444
Threads: 100
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation:
1
Cassius Dio book XLIX
chap 20
20 In this way he met Pacorus in Syria Cyrrhestica and conquered him. For when he had not prevented them from p383crossing the river and had not attacked them at once after they had got across, they imputed sloth and weakness to the Romans and therefore marched against their camp, although it was on high ground, expecting to take it without resistance. 2But when a sally was suddenly made, the assailants, being cavalry, were driven back down the slope without difficulty; and although at the foot they defended themselves valiantly, the majority of them being in armour, yet they were confused by the unexpectedness of the onslaught and by stumbling over one another and were defeated by the heavy-armed men and [size=150:bo1gl7gm]especially by the slingers[/size]; for these struck them from a distance with their powerful missiles and so were exceedingly difficult for them to withstand. 3The fall of Pacorus in this struggle was a very great loss to them; for as soon as they perceived that their leader had perished, although a few men zealously fought for his body, yet when these also were slain, all the rest gave way. Some of them desired to escape homeward across the bridge and were unable to do so, being cut off and killed before they could reach it, and others fled for refuge to Antiochus in Commagene. 4Ventidius easily brought into subjection all the rest out of Syria, which had been hesitating while awaiting the outcome of the war, by sending the prince's head about through the different cities; for the Syrians felt unusual affection for Pacorus on account of his justice and mildness, an affection as great as they had felt for the best kings that had ever ruled them. 5And Ventidius himself made an expedition against Antiochus, on the plea that the latter had not delivered up to him the refugees, but really because of the vast wealth which he possessed.
Johnny Shumate
Posts: 2,730
Threads: 20
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation:
33
Quote:Ok. Lets get to business. This is about the constrcution of the lorica hamata used in the test I gave the link above:
A translation would help. What sort of riveting was employed? What did they use to simulate a subarmalis? If the link diameter is 9-10mm then that is way too large for typical Roman mail. 6-7 mm is far more typical. The alignment is wrong too. If you hang mail the way it is in the above photo then the weight of the armour spreads the links making them more susceptible to thrusting attacks. Rotate the mail 90 degrees and you'll find the armour functions far more effectively. My initial impression is that this test is biased heavily against the armour.
Posts: 1,313
Threads: 193
Joined: Apr 2006
Reputation:
4
I've written an email to the testers and invited them to share in a constructive discussion here about the mail used and the testing conditions.
I really would like to see them here at the forum.
Stefan (Literary references to the discussed topics are always appreciated.)
Posts: 74
Threads: 1
Joined: Nov 2003
Reputation:
0
In my opinion a 61# bow is not really powerful enough to be a war bow. Longbows were 110# and above sometimes 160#. I normally shoot a 70# bow and it will just about penetrate 18mm plywood using target points at 50 yards.
Aulus Cladius Maximus
Bernard Jacobs
Any opinion stated is genally not the opinion of My group or Centurian
Posts: 74
Threads: 1
Joined: Nov 2003
Reputation:
0
Using google translation tools and an Idea of what they are saying I have produced a poor translation of the article. It will however enable non german speakers to get the bare bones of their findings. I don't speak german but I do speak archery
Aulus Cladius maximus
To the protective effect of Roman armoring of the 1. century n.Chr in relation to arrow bombardment in the experiment.
Introduction
With examination of the historical sources of writing of the antique ones the impression may develop, bow
contactors often and were used, however no substantial meaning for the fighting in detail would regularly have
possessed. The military writers against it point several times to the meaning sagittarii (among other things. Vegetius
epitoma 1.15). This obvious depreciating of the bow weapon by the historians may therefore agitate that sagittarii
among the auxiliary troops (Auxilia) it ranked and the historical writers therefore less important published than the
members of the putting ion infantry. Perhaps however one classified the bow also rather as `mechanical
Hilfsmittel´ as military weapon; exactly the same as also the portion of the artillery of the battle happening relatively
rarely one mentions.
Also regarding a protective effect in relation to arrow bombardment in the Roman army a body armoring was used,
which predominantly consisted in the 1.centuryn.Chr of the so-called chain shirt (lorica hamata) or the segmented
armour (lorica segmentata, modern designation). The Chain Mail was usually from into one another seizing iron
rings worked, in each case in the changes punched (anuli) and rings from wire (hami), whose ends were course-
riveted.
The Segmented armour however consisted of mobile on a system sheet metals forged by leather belt put on.
The thickness of the found sheet metal fragments is enough from approximately 1.2 - 1.7 mm. With some pieces of
find the thickness is with about 2 mm, and in Carnuntum (German old person castle, Austria) shoulder segments
with 3 mm of thickness were excavated, which according to older standards 20. century even for firearms as bulletproof
applies. These data for the sheet metal are already settled, thus without rust loss or - opening.
The rings of the chain mail occur in quite different dimensions. Anuli the however about 9 mm are large on the
average, with an opening of approximately 6 mm and approx. 1.5 - 1.6 mm of thickness. However also substantially
larger and just as also smaller rings occur. Both armour types were appropriate for the protection of the torso,
shoulders and upper arms, whereby the segment armour ended already scarcely underneath the waist, while the
chain shirt covered usually for instance a third of the thighs.
In the comparison to the not evenly rich find property of armoring, the soil inventory excludes itself to the bow
weapon still more modestly. There the bow s exclusively of organic material consisted, remained parts of it
naturally only in rare exceptional cases. Such a stroke of luck is present for instance with the find of several horn
ends, which are kept now in the Huntarian museum (Glasgow). Horn parts of this kind belong to bow s, which
consisted of a wood core to Komposit (reflex), which was reinforced with horn with chords and in the back in front.
When stretching the horn was tossed and the chords experiences a stretch. Due to this building method an optimal
weight achievement relation and the dimensions of the weapon develop could be kept relatively small. Picture
The received representations in the relief art show continuous these short bow s, however their form does not
correspond probably to the antique reality. Only the illustration on the gravestone bow contactors from
Housesteads (Hadrian's barrier), now in the museum OF Antiquities, Newcastle upon Tyne, seems to approximate
the actual shape of the bow s. Picture
Eiben long bow can be identified on no representation and are, probably at the very front because of their passing
condition, also in the find property not provable. Whether the long bow in the antique use found or not, leaves
itself due to missing evidence to clarify at the moment not surely.
Naturally the metallic heads of the arrow are in the archaeological material very many more numerously
represented. The most frequent projectile types are on the one hand three blade, on the other hand pyramid-
shaped projectiles, so-called “Bodkinâ€
Bernard Jacobs
Any opinion stated is genally not the opinion of My group or Centurian
Posts: 16
Threads: 1
Joined: May 2007
Reputation:
0
Reading that makes my head hurt...
Posts: 101
Threads: 4
Joined: Aug 2005
Reputation:
0
I agree, that was a somewhat painful read. :lol:
While they tried to do a decent test, they failed on a few key points. One is that they used modern material for the mail rather than what was in use at the time. This would have had a very different effect on their data. Mild steel is not wrought iron by any stretch of the imagination. Another thing is the fact that the link size is quite large and does not seem to be very representative of the mail in use at the time. This is in reference to both diameter and thickness.
I also question their conclusion that the riveted joint is the weakest part of the link. This only seems to happen when the link has been subjected to heat treatment in the form of normalizing or annealing after it has been riveted closed. Otherwise, the riveted joint is actually stronger than the surrounding link material due to it being work hardened. Unless of course the riveting is poorly done that is.
Posts: 3,559
Threads: 275
Joined: Jul 2005
Reputation:
10
Quote:In my opinion a 61# bow is not really powerful enough to be a war bow. Longbows were 110# and above sometimes 160#. I normally shoot a 70# bow and it will just about penetrate 18mm plywood using target points at 50 yards. Aulus Cladius Maximus
Yes, I agree. I have a 110# pound bow (with a 30 inch draw) and I think that the "warbows" of the roman era must have been at least this heavy. It is not a superhuman effort to shoot with it and a trained roman auxiliary must have handled one quite easily...
Virilis / Jyrki Halme
PHILODOX
Moderator
Posts: 13,279
Threads: 102
Joined: May 2006
Reputation:
3
The test link shown by Dan is pretty interesting, but i would also tend to agree with Jyrki, that the Romans would have used pretty powerful bows.
They were in the business of killing the enemy, afterall!
Visne partem mei capere? Comminus agamus! * Me semper rogo, Quid faceret Iulius Caesar? * Confidence is a good thing! Overconfidence is too much of a good thing.
[b]Legio XIIII GMV. (Q. Magivs)RMRS Remember Atuatuca! Vengence will be ours!
Titus Flavius Germanus
Batavian Coh I
Byron Angel
Posts: 278
Threads: 41
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
2
What about the arrows? Do the trilobite arrows in combination with composite bow have some special effect on loricae?
Stefan Pop-Lazic
by a stuff demand, and personal hesitation
Posts: 56
Threads: 10
Joined: Aug 2007
Reputation:
0
Romans did have composite bows but they were less used
Hi my name is johnathan :lol: <img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_lol.gif" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing" />:lol:
I would like to help as much as possible
|