06-26-2006, 11:05 PM
This is indeed a big problem in archaeological research. A lot of archaeologists working in the field believe that some very important thing took place on their dig-site. I know a prehistoric archaeologist who digs in Soedan and he believes the migration route of the Homo Sapiens out of Africa passed his digsite. Another archaeologist digging in the Near East believes in an alternate theory that has the migration route pass his digsite...
As archaeology isn't an exact science it is very hard not to see and interpret the remains the way you would like them to be. You cannot have a theory and interpret the evidence to fit this theory...
I'm very curious to know the dating results of these skeletons. I anxiously await a more in depth report.
Regards,
As archaeology isn't an exact science it is very hard not to see and interpret the remains the way you would like them to be. You cannot have a theory and interpret the evidence to fit this theory...
I'm very curious to know the dating results of these skeletons. I anxiously await a more in depth report.
Regards,
