02-22-2006, 11:11 PM
Quote:I have no problem with them being leather. So long as it is stipluated that they have no practical function other than to look pretty - ceremonial costumes similar to the "faux brigandine" in Asian courts mentioned earlier by Felix.
This is certainly a possibility, perhaps even a probability and I freely admit it, and I respect that that's your opinion, but I can't concede to an absolute rule on the basis of one person's, or several persons' judgment on what a person dead for some 1800+ years would have thought to be acceptable.
I have said many times that I think that by the Antonine period that these are probably ceremonial. However, since I have evidence that leather musculata were in use prior to this time, I cannot concede the possibility that it was always so, and that they had NO practical function.
Travis
Theodoros of Smyrna (Byzantine name)
aka Travis Lee Clark (21st C. American name)
Moderator, RAT
Rules for RAT:
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.romanarmy.com/rat/viewtopic.php?Rules">http://www.romanarmy.com/rat/viewtopic.php?Rules for posting
Oh! and the Toledo helmet .... oh hell, forget it. :? <img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_confused.gif" alt=":?" title="Confused" />:?
aka Travis Lee Clark (21st C. American name)
Moderator, RAT
Rules for RAT:
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.romanarmy.com/rat/viewtopic.php?Rules">http://www.romanarmy.com/rat/viewtopic.php?Rules for posting
Oh! and the Toledo helmet .... oh hell, forget it. :? <img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_confused.gif" alt=":?" title="Confused" />:?