Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Pasta - did the Romans have it?
#5
From what I can tell, they had something sort of like pasta, although it was fried, not cooked in water. It was just a paste of wheat flour and water fried in oil, sometimes interpreted as pasta but very unlike what we are familiar with.

~Aurelia
Aurelia Coritana
aka Laura Sweet
[url:3tjsw0iy]http://www.theromanway.org[/url]
[url:3tjsw0iy]http://www.legionten.org[/url]

Si vales, gaudeo. (If you are well, then I am happy.)
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Pasta - did the Romans have it? - by Carus Andiae - 02-06-2006, 05:58 PM
Pasta - by Carus Andiae - 02-07-2006, 12:47 PM
Re: Pasta - did the Romans have it? - by lvcivs - 02-16-2006, 11:11 PM
Re: Pasta - did the Romans have it? - by Aurelia - 05-22-2006, 02:03 PM
Re: Pasta - did the Romans have it? - by lvcivs - 05-24-2006, 06:27 PM
Re: Pasta - did the Romans have it? - by lvcivs - 05-25-2006, 03:43 PM
Re: Pasta - did the Romans have it? - by Arthes - 04-29-2007, 11:43 AM
Re: Pasta - did the Romans have it? - by Arthes - 04-29-2007, 12:19 PM
Re: Pasta in ancient Rome - by satsobek - 05-31-2007, 10:57 AM
Re: Pasta - did the Romans have it? - by satsobek - 05-31-2007, 12:13 PM

Forum Jump: