12-27-2005, 01:22 AM
Interesting snippet of evidence, Tarbicus. 
I can see a common link between re-enactment & civil disturbance - in my experience, there is usually an aspect of restraint on both sides, a general wish to avoid out & out violence. I think this adds to the effectiveness of the wedge in these environments, as a conscientious person on the receiving end will be inclined to fall back so as to avoid injuries to either side.
I agree with Hibernicus about the timing & use of the wedge - it might be costly or even futile to attack well ordered, determined troops in this way, but one might seek to charge a faltering line or gap. I understand this was true of cavalry charges which were suicidal in the wrong circumstances but which could turn a battle used appropriately at the decisive moment.
I can see a common link between re-enactment & civil disturbance - in my experience, there is usually an aspect of restraint on both sides, a general wish to avoid out & out violence. I think this adds to the effectiveness of the wedge in these environments, as a conscientious person on the receiving end will be inclined to fall back so as to avoid injuries to either side.
I agree with Hibernicus about the timing & use of the wedge - it might be costly or even futile to attack well ordered, determined troops in this way, but one might seek to charge a faltering line or gap. I understand this was true of cavalry charges which were suicidal in the wrong circumstances but which could turn a battle used appropriately at the decisive moment.
Salvianus: Ste Kenwright
A member of Comitatus Late Roman Historical Re-enactment Group
My Re-enactment Journal
~ antiquum obtinens ~
A member of Comitatus Late Roman Historical Re-enactment Group
My Re-enactment Journal
~ antiquum obtinens ~
