Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Roman soldiers in China
#10
<b><i>Quote:</i></b><hr> The Hsi-yu-chuan of the Hou-han-shu contains for the first time a description, consisting of 589 characters, of the westernmost amongst the countries described in Han literature previous to the Ming dynasty, the country of Ta-ts'in. In this description we find quite a number of facts regarding the situation of the country, its boundaries, capital, people, products, and industries, which would, apart from any collateral information derived from later histories, have furnished a sufficient basis for the identification of the country, had not an unfortunate prejudice at once taken possession of those European sinologues who investigated the subject, for they held to the opinion that Ta-ts'in, being the most powerful country described in the Far West, must necessarily be the Roman Etnpire in its full extent, with Rome as its capital. This theory has been especially defended by Visdelou and de Guignes, and recently by Bretschneider, Edkins, and von Richthofen. <b> I must confess that I once shared that prejudice, and that when, two years ago, I commenced to collect the passages relating to this question, I did so for the purpose of supporting the arguments in favor of Rome and Italy. I soon found, however, that a close examination of the Han accounts, instead of substantiating my original views, induced me to abandon them altogether. In these records mention is made of the manufacture of storax, which has been shown by Hanbury to have been at all times confined to the Levant; of the use of crystal (glass) and precious stones as architectural ornaments; of foreign ambassadors being driven by post from the frontier to the capital;</b> of the military system of the country, which was based on the division of ten and three; of the dangerous travelling, the roads being infested with tigers and lions, thus compelling wayfarers to resort to caravans. A consideration of this among other testimony forcibly suggested the idea that Ta-ts'in was not Rome itself, but one of its eastern provinces.<hr> <p><BR><p align=center><font color=gold><font size=3>
_________________________________<BR>
CASCA TARQVINIVS GEMINVS<BR>
<a href=http://www.legio-ix-hispana.org> LEG IX HSPA COH V CEN VIII CON III </font></font><BR> <font color=gold> <font size=3>
_________________________________</font></font></p><i></i>
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Roman soldiers in China - by Anonymous - 01-23-2002, 07:12 PM
Re: Roman soldiers in China - by Anonymous - 01-23-2002, 07:17 PM
Not again... - by Matthew Amt - 01-24-2002, 08:25 PM
Re: Not again... - by Anonymous - 01-24-2002, 08:33 PM
Re: Not again... - by Anonymous - 01-25-2002, 04:58 PM
Re: Not again... - by mcbishop - 01-25-2002, 07:17 PM
Re: Not again... - by Anonymous - 01-25-2002, 07:20 PM
... - by Catiline - 01-25-2002, 07:22 PM
Re: Roman soldiers in China - by Anonymous - 01-27-2002, 09:38 AM
Re: Roman soldiers in China - by Anonymous - 01-27-2002, 05:37 PM
Hmmm... - by Anonymous - 02-02-2002, 10:21 AM
yep, them cover ups - by Goffredo - 02-03-2002, 05:23 PM
Re: yep, them cover ups - by Anonymous - 02-03-2002, 06:41 PM
Re: yep, them cover ups - by Anonymous - 02-03-2002, 09:41 PM
Re: yep, them cover ups - by Anonymous - 02-05-2002, 04:00 AM
Re: yep, them cover ups - by Anonymous - 02-05-2002, 04:31 AM
well, actually - by Goffredo - 02-05-2002, 09:30 AM
Re: well, actually - by Anonymous - 02-05-2002, 02:41 PM
Re: Roman soldiers in China - by Anonymous - 03-06-2004, 12:39 PM
Legio 54 where arrre yoooou? - by Anonymous - 03-08-2004, 02:37 AM
> Legio 54 where arrre yoooou? - by Anonymous - 03-27-2004, 05:41 PM
> > Legio 54 where arrre yoooou? - by Anonymous - 04-01-2004, 11:32 AM
Re: > > Legio 54 where arrre yoooou? - by Anonymous - 04-06-2004, 03:08 AM

Forum Jump: