Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Did Romans bury soldiers in armor or save the armor
#7
The Vermand Treasure is a pretty decent example (c. 371ish). The man was a Sarmatian in the Roman army. Another example is the Budapest III burial (c. 380ish), who also may have been a Sarmatian.

By the late 4th century Germanic influence had made weapons burials popular among the army. Usually though they were limited to lance heads and the like. Items that could be re-issued to new troops, like armor, helmets, and swords, are pretty rare in Roman weapons burials.

There's one burial from Romania we've been discussing on the FB Roman group. 5th Century, he was probably an Alan, and was in Roman service as he possessed a proper ridge helmet.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Did Romans bury soldiers in armor or save the armor - by Flavivs Aetivs - 09-18-2018, 06:06 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Did Romans bury their own dead soldiers in mass graves? Jason Micallef 2 427 09-15-2022, 12:12 PM
Last Post: MonsGraupius
Question When Did The Roman Army Standardize Using Plate Armor? TerminusFarseeR 21 2,297 08-27-2021, 09:07 AM
Last Post: Hanny
  How many armor soldiers did the Roman soldier bring to the battlefield Leoshenlong 18 2,758 05-07-2021, 05:39 PM
Last Post: CaesarAugustus

Forum Jump: