10-19-2016, 04:02 PM
Very interesting (and old too) argument.
I remember this raged in the first years of the "after-gladiator-movie Era" when someone proposed a sort of list of good and not good groups, or a sort or certification/card that aimed to guarantee some historical hortodoxy.
Someone also tried to do that, but was not a success for many reasons.
I would like to get a sort of federation or a leading group of academic/professionals who are able to set a standard, write and share it and then groups can freely subscribe that "manifest" and then follow the relative guidelines. Who don't follow guidelines is taken out of the list and cannot tell to be in that list.
Very simple I think, but requires a huge work and a stable group of people who take care of the organization.
I remember this raged in the first years of the "after-gladiator-movie Era" when someone proposed a sort of list of good and not good groups, or a sort or certification/card that aimed to guarantee some historical hortodoxy.
Someone also tried to do that, but was not a success for many reasons.
I would like to get a sort of federation or a leading group of academic/professionals who are able to set a standard, write and share it and then groups can freely subscribe that "manifest" and then follow the relative guidelines. Who don't follow guidelines is taken out of the list and cannot tell to be in that list.
Very simple I think, but requires a huge work and a stable group of people who take care of the organization.
