05-20-2016, 04:04 PM
Good morning, all! I haven't posted here since Jenny still ran the place...my former nick was "TheCaesarionSection"
I'll raise this thread from the dead because I'm wondering if Deepeeka has any plans on correcting those god forsaken circular helmet bowls, with respect to their Imperial Gallic line (with the exception of the Imp. Gallic A). Has all further development of this line concluded?
The 1.5" gap between temple and rim has ALWAYS bothered me- ALOT. Doesn't seem to bother folks around here a great deal, though - "just tape a little more padding around your head, and you're good to go..." or "place it on its side and bust a WWF-style diving elbow drop on it..."
It looks bad. I mean really bad...
Would such an alteration to the helmet bowls to bring them a bit more anatomical, at the manufacturing level, really be that burdensome and financially unfeasible?
-Regards, David Mitchell
Vacaville, CA
I'll raise this thread from the dead because I'm wondering if Deepeeka has any plans on correcting those god forsaken circular helmet bowls, with respect to their Imperial Gallic line (with the exception of the Imp. Gallic A). Has all further development of this line concluded?
The 1.5" gap between temple and rim has ALWAYS bothered me- ALOT. Doesn't seem to bother folks around here a great deal, though - "just tape a little more padding around your head, and you're good to go..." or "place it on its side and bust a WWF-style diving elbow drop on it..."
It looks bad. I mean really bad...
Would such an alteration to the helmet bowls to bring them a bit more anatomical, at the manufacturing level, really be that burdensome and financially unfeasible?
-Regards, David Mitchell
Vacaville, CA
Regards, David
