10-08-2010, 05:52 AM
Paul B. wrote:
Surely a side-on stance like a fencer is a 'non sequitur', and not under realistic consideration ? hock:
Ah, Grasshopper !! At long last enlightenment is dawning !
Quote:Now if we found a lost text by Xenophon describing side-on pushing in detail,.......
Surely a side-on stance like a fencer is a 'non sequitur', and not under realistic consideration ? hock:
Quote:If hoplites did not do something that a later shield wall could not, then the special designation of "othismos" becomes frivolous, and the phalanx is simply a wall of shields that pushes against its opposite at times an might even find itself acting a bit crowd-like for short periods like every other shield wall in history.
Ah, Grasshopper !! At long last enlightenment is dawning !
"dulce et decorum est pro patria mori " - Horace
(It is a sweet and proper thing to die for ones country)
"No son-of-a-bitch ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country" - George C Scott as General George S. Patton
Paul McDonnell-Staff
(It is a sweet and proper thing to die for ones country)
"No son-of-a-bitch ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country" - George C Scott as General George S. Patton
Paul McDonnell-Staff