Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Dacians importance in Roman Army
#11
I think it is notable that at least one eminent historian implied that the annexation of Dacia was a mistake.

Quote:The Scythian hordes, which, towards the east, bordered on the new settlements of the Goths, presented nothing to their arms, except the doubtful chance of an unprofitable victory. But the prospect of the Roman territories was far more alluring; and the fields of Dacia were covered with rich harvests, sown by the hands of an industrious, and exposed to be gathered by those of a warlike, people. It is probable that the conquests of Trajan, maintained by its successors less for any real advantage than for ideal dignity, had contributed to weaken the empire on that side. The new and unsettled province of Dacia was neither strong enough to resist, nor rich enough to satiate, the rapaciousness of the barbarians.

Edward Gibbon, X.
David J. Cord
www.davidcord.com
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Dacians importance in Roman Army - by diegis - 04-01-2010, 08:48 PM
Re: Dacians importance in Roman Army - by Rumo - 04-01-2010, 09:11 PM
Re: Dacians importance in Roman Army - by diegis - 04-02-2010, 06:16 AM
Re: Dacians importance in Roman Army - by diegis - 04-02-2010, 10:39 AM
Re: Dacians importance in Roman Army - by Rumo - 04-06-2010, 09:15 PM
Re: Dacians importance in Roman Army - by Epictetus - 05-01-2010, 10:24 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The importance of Roman Reconstruction Archaeology John Conyard 47 10,340 07-28-2010, 12:29 PM
Last Post: Vindex
  Importance of Roman Cavalry Anonymous 22 4,433 05-26-2006, 12:51 PM
Last Post: Kate Gilliver
  Dacians and Roman Army Anonymous 0 915 09-22-2002, 03:08 PM
Last Post: Anonymous

Forum Jump: