02-26-2010, 06:54 AM
Today we recognise the “Fall of the Republic” as a decisive event. Conventionally, we see a fundamental change in governance taking place. We also see a change in public policy and strategy, to some extent. We even use terms that reflect this, such as the “Republican period” or “Imperial period.”
So here’s my question: at the time, or shortly thereafter, did the Romans think that a decisive shift in the res publica had taken place?
So here’s my question: at the time, or shortly thereafter, did the Romans think that a decisive shift in the res publica had taken place?
David J. Cord
www.davidcord.com
www.davidcord.com