10-11-2009, 08:12 PM
[url:3i03u4y2]http://www.romanarmy.com/cms/component/option,com_helmets/task,view/cid,103/Itemid,96/[/url]
I was wondering why the helmet is in the database dated like it is, since the tomb whence it derives dates safely between 30 and 10 BCE?
See:
M. Gustin, Posocje in der jüngeren Eissenzeit. Catalogi et monographiae 27. Ljubljana 1991.
I was wondering why the helmet is in the database dated like it is, since the tomb whence it derives dates safely between 30 and 10 BCE?
See:
M. Gustin, Posocje in der jüngeren Eissenzeit. Catalogi et monographiae 27. Ljubljana 1991.
Christian K.
No reconstruendum => No reconstruction.
Ut desint vires, tamen est laudanda voluntas.
No reconstruendum => No reconstruction.
Ut desint vires, tamen est laudanda voluntas.