|
unarmoured auxiliaries
|
03-11-2005, 07:29 PM
is there any evidence to suggest or disprove that auxiliary spearmen serving in the rear rank in the 1st-2nd century may or may not have worn body armour, I really see no reason why some might have lacked this. Armour was expensive, and also troops of some ethnicities would have a a cultural reason not to wear it. <p></p><i></i>
aka., John Shook
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
unarmoured auxiliaries - by TFLAVIUSAMBIORIX - 03-11-2005, 07:29 PM
Possibly, but why? - by Carlton Bach - 03-11-2005, 08:49 PM
skirmishers - by TFLAVIUSAMBIORIX - 03-11-2005, 09:06 PM
Re: skirmishers - by Quintius Clavus - 03-12-2005, 12:31 AM
Re: skirmishers - by Crispvs - 03-12-2005, 04:37 PM
Re: skirmishers - by Carlton Bach - 03-12-2005, 10:19 PM
|
