12-14-2004, 03:46 PM
Hi Neuralmancer,<br>
No, I won't try to rivet such a small ring, I would end up pulling all of my hair out in frustration! I don't have the patience to rivet larger rings, much less one that tiny. I had intended to use butted rings. The wire is not very thin, (it is 17 guage) which means that with rings that tiny, the mail will be very dense, which is actually what I want...<br>
Basically, what I am looking for is proof that rings that small existed... <p>Lucius Aurelius Metellus, draconarius, Secunda Brittanica</p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p200.ezboard.com/bromanarmytalk.showUserPublicProfile?gid=luciusaureliusmetellus@romanarmytalk>Lucius Aurelius Metellus</A> <IMG HEIGHT=10 WIDTH=10 SRC="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v384/Lucius68/Lucius.jpg" BORDER=0> at: 12/14/04 4:53 pm<br></i>
No, I won't try to rivet such a small ring, I would end up pulling all of my hair out in frustration! I don't have the patience to rivet larger rings, much less one that tiny. I had intended to use butted rings. The wire is not very thin, (it is 17 guage) which means that with rings that tiny, the mail will be very dense, which is actually what I want...<br>
Basically, what I am looking for is proof that rings that small existed... <p>Lucius Aurelius Metellus, draconarius, Secunda Brittanica</p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p200.ezboard.com/bromanarmytalk.showUserPublicProfile?gid=luciusaureliusmetellus@romanarmytalk>Lucius Aurelius Metellus</A> <IMG HEIGHT=10 WIDTH=10 SRC="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v384/Lucius68/Lucius.jpg" BORDER=0> at: 12/14/04 4:53 pm<br></i>
Lucius Aurelius Metellus
a.k.a. Jeffrey L. Greene
MODERATOR
a.k.a. Jeffrey L. Greene
MODERATOR
