11-01-2008, 10:41 AM
Avete,
As far as I know: usual age of recruits was seventeen or eighteen, I am not sure now :oops: If a roman boy has put off his toga praetexta and has donned his new toga for citizens (white toga - toga candida?), he was adult man and he could have entered the forces legaly. Personaly, I know about cases where recruits were younger than seventeen: in critical times for Rome. In my opinion: It was not common to join up in four-teen but it was possible. Also, as far I know, a recruit could have been older than seventeen, for instance twenty and more. Easily, you could have entered the forces, when you were able to fight :-) )
vale and regards
As far as I know: usual age of recruits was seventeen or eighteen, I am not sure now :oops: If a roman boy has put off his toga praetexta and has donned his new toga for citizens (white toga - toga candida?), he was adult man and he could have entered the forces legaly. Personaly, I know about cases where recruits were younger than seventeen: in critical times for Rome. In my opinion: It was not common to join up in four-teen but it was possible. Also, as far I know, a recruit could have been older than seventeen, for instance twenty and more. Easily, you could have entered the forces, when you were able to fight :-) )
vale and regards
Radka Hlavacova A.K.A Titvs Iventivs Martivs
Tesserarivs Legio IIII FF
Castra Romana, Czech republic
"Concordia militvm"
Tesserarivs Legio IIII FF
Castra Romana, Czech republic
"Concordia militvm"