08-12-2008, 07:53 AM
Hi Mateo,
Sure, I understand that the primary purpose of the series is to entertain, and that a lot of the imagery may or may not be conjecture, artistic licence, or complete bs. Is it then your opinion that this "heron standard" example is bogus?
The question I'm asking is, are there any reliable sources that deal with the subject? If so, I'd be interested to hear about them.
Thanks,
Geert
Sure, I understand that the primary purpose of the series is to entertain, and that a lot of the imagery may or may not be conjecture, artistic licence, or complete bs. Is it then your opinion that this "heron standard" example is bogus?
The question I'm asking is, are there any reliable sources that deal with the subject? If so, I'd be interested to hear about them.
Thanks,
Geert
